Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

50074

in Ellston, IowaPopulation 215

55.20/ 100

Ranked #9,208 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #254 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing insecurity

5.9%

in the bottom 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.6%

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

in the bottom 4.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.47%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

4.2%

in the bottom 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

97.5%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

74.3%

in the top 4.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.1%

in the bottom 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$121,094

in the top 9.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Distance to an emergency room

14.4 mi

in the top 12.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare-certified hospital with an emergency room.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, Ellston, Iowa (ZIP 50074) lands in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,208th) and the top 28% of Iowa (254th).

continue reading

Strengths and concerns sit side by side across the measures here: modeled housing insecurity lands in the bottom 2.4% nationally, and transportation registers in the bottom 4.4% nationally. Modeled transportation noise sits in the bottom 4.7% nationally, and poverty rests in the bottom 4.8% nationally. Modeled utility shutoff is in the bottom 5.0% nationally, homeownership stands in the top 6.1% nationally, and modeled colon screening settles in the top 4.2% nationally. Unemployment lies at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled food insecurity resides in the bottom 7.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle lands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs.

To translate a couple of terms, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 50861, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 98%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Disability

healthier than 59%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 18%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 87%

14%

Preventive Care

in the top 0.5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 99%

8%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 48%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 52%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 48%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 2%

21%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.7%32.7–41.1
High blood pressure among adults44.3%39.6–49.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults14.0%12.6–15.5
Current asthma among adults9.7%8.5–11.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.7%8.4–11.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.8%7.2–10.6
Depression among adults18.9%15.9–22.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.5%12.3–17.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.2%38.5–48.0
Obesity among adults41.9%33.7–50.8
Stroke among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.4%9.3–13.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.3%4.2–6.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure85.6%83.1–87.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults83.7%81.0–86.3
Cholesterol screening among adults90.8%89.5–92.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years74.3%69.8–78.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.4%66.2–72.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years80.2%73.5–85.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.8%13.2–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.1%10.6–15.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults25.9%20.9–31.2
Short sleep duration among adults31.5%25.6–37.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.0%15.0–21.5
Frequent mental distress among adults13.1%11.5–15.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.9%11.9–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.1%9.5–12.9
Any disability among adults30.7%26.1–35.9
Hearing disability among adults10.4%9.1–12.0
Independent living disability among adults6.9%5.9–8.2
Mobility disability among adults16.0%13.2–19.1
Self-care disability among adults3.6%3.0–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%17.4–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.4–10.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.1–8.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.8–7.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.6%3.9–5.4
Loneliness among adults29.0%24.0–34.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.2%3.4–4.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–645.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)3.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)55.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription88.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate97.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households93.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+54.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age67.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$121,094$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$605,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 0.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.75 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured