Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

52329

in Rowley, IowaPopulation 671

55.20/ 100

Ranked #9,206 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranked #253 of 922 Iowa ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

21.9%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

9.6%

in the bottom 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

81.4%

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Rowley, Iowa (ZIP 52329) lands in the top 29% healthiest ZIPs nationally (9,206th) and the top 27% of Iowa (253rd).

continue reading

The picture here is genuinely mixed, with readings on both sides: civic sits in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled pfas is in the bottom 8.2% nationally. Modeled mammography settles in the top 5.5% nationally. Crowded housing resides at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise registers in the bottom 14.9% nationally, and housing insecurity rests in the bottom 16% nationally. On the other side, modeled binge drinking stands in the top 1.9% nationally, modeled radon lies in the top 14.3% nationally, and home broadband subscription lands in the bottom 13.9% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility sits at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

A note on the terms: pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 50644, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 80%

8%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 35%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 72%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 76%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 40%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.8%24.3–31.2
High blood pressure among adults36.4%32.1–40.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
Current asthma among adults9.8%8.6–11.0
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%5.9–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%5.9–8.0
Depression among adults19.7%16.7–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.4%9.7–13.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.5%32.1–40.9
Obesity among adults38.0%30.3–46.1
Stroke among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.8%9.5–14.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%4.8–7.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.6%75.5–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.8%74.4–81.3
Cholesterol screening among adults85.6%83.7–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.8%62.8–72.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.1%64.7–71.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.4%75.0–86.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults21.9%18.5–25.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%12.8–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.5%19.0–28.1
Short sleep duration among adults34.7%28.6–41.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.8%14.2–19.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.5%13.5–17.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.7%11.0–14.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.8%11.0–14.7
Any disability among adults27.0%22.9–31.4
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.6–8.5
Independent living disability among adults6.9%5.9–7.9
Mobility disability among adults12.4%10.5–14.5
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.8–3.8
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%19.3–26.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%7.8–12.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.2–10.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.5–9.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.8–6.8
Loneliness among adults30.1%25.2–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.6–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3648.5% (2.7–19.1%) n=931
Uninsured 18–644.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.4% (0.7–14.7%) n=931
No HS diploma (25+)1.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5055.1% (1.6–12.9%) n=932
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50520.9% (9.8–36.8%) n=932
Unemployment rate (16+)4.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2742.2% (0.0–6.7%) n=932
Households without a vehicle1.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3222.4% (0.0–7.9%) n=931
Broadband subscription78.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.5% (77.9–95.1%) n=931
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32218.2% (9.0–28.8%) n=931
Homeownership rate88.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32282.1% (66.8–93.5%) n=931
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.4% (0.0–3.3%) n=931
Foreign-born population0.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–7.2%) n=932
Single-parent households70.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.8% (43.7–75.5%) n=928
Population 65+29.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.2% (12.7–31.0%) n=932
Median age54.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29242.7 yr (34.1–54.7) n=931
Median household income$57,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,848 ($55,055–$102,762) n=911
Median home value$171,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$161,100 ($93,820–$278,170) n=892
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$825 ($614–$1,113) n=771
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth81.3 yr ± 1.5978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.0 yr (77.2–83.4) n=917

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.59 years of 81.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured