Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49038

in Coloma, MichiganPopulation 8,616

47.72/ 100

Ranked #19,301 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 40%)

Ranked #649 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #16 of 23 Niles, MI ZIPs (bottom 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFAS in drinking water

61%

in the top 7.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Coloma, Michigan (ZIP 49038) sits in the bottom 40% nationally (19,301st) and the bottom 33% of Michigan (649th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: elder services stands in the top 13.8% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the bottom 14.5% nationally, and modeled colon screening rests in the top 14.2% nationally. Pharmacy sits in the top 22% nationally, childcare registers in the top 22% nationally, and physicians lands in the top 22% nationally. Distance to an emergency room resides in the bottom 24% nationally. On the other hand, modeled pfas lies in the top 7.6% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site settles in the bottom 20% nationally. Distance to a nursing home stands in the top 22% nationally.

In plain language, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. ZIP 49084, about 0.2 miles away, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Niles, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 80%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 41%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 74%

14%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 45%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 27%

21%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 30%

11%

Disability

healthier than 27%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 12%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 81%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 50%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 56%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 38%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Disability

healthier than 38%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 19%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 79.4; chronic-disease standing 27.4 — 52 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,337 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.9%30.7–37.0
High blood pressure among adults39.8%36.0–43.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.5–11.5
Current asthma among adults11.9%10.7–13.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%7.7–9.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.2%9.1–11.3
Depression among adults27.2%23.8–30.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.5%11.8–15.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.2%33.4–41.1
Obesity among adults38.7%32.7–45.0
Stroke among adults4.3%3.9–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.9%10.7–15.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%6.2–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.7%75.9–81.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.3–82.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.7–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.2%67.2–75.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults66.7%63.8–69.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.1%70.0–81.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.3%12.8–18.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%14.4–19.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.9%24.1–31.9
Short sleep duration among adults36.6%31.6–42.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.6%19.0–24.1
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%16.1–19.8
Frequent physical distress among adults16.2%14.5–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.8%14.1–17.4
Any disability among adults35.9%31.9–39.8
Hearing disability among adults9.1%8.2–10.1
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.8–10.8
Mobility disability among adults16.9%14.8–18.9
Self-care disability among adults4.5%4.0–4.9
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.0–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.3%19.0–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.3%13.1–17.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.0%12.9–17.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.3%9.6–13.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.1%7.1–9.2
Loneliness among adults31.6%27.1–36.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.3–9.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–645.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)9.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)3.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle6.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription89.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate76.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population3.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households66.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+22.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age45.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$62,636$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$206,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$938$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.7 yr ± 0.7578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.75 years of 77.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured