Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24938

in Frankford, West VirginiaPopulation 1,233

45.90/ 100

Ranked #21,451 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 33%)

Ranked #46 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (top 6.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Housing-cost burden

4.5%

in the bottom 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

19.1 mi

in the top 5.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.68 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.68 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.7%

in the bottom 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US19th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

70.3%

in the top 19% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US81st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

7.1%

in the bottom 29% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US29th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Frankford, West Virginia (ZIP 24938) ranks in the bottom 33% nationally (21,451st) and the top 6.6% of West Virginia (46th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 4.8% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility settles in the top 5.3% nationally. Childcare rests in the top 5.5% nationally, and civic lands in the top 8.0% nationally. Modeled extreme heat settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise rests in the bottom 10.8% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Distance to a community health center settles at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Crowded housing rests at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. On the other side, fiber broadband lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Extreme heat is a modeled count of days a year reaching a dangerously high temperature, a leading weather hazard. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 24131, about 17 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 62%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 34%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 84%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 78%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 97%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 87%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 57%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 85.9; chronic-disease standing 14.2 — 72 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #964 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults39.9%35.9–43.6
High blood pressure among adults44.4%40.0–48.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.5%9.5–11.7
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.5–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.9%7.8–10.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.4%8.9–12.1
Depression among adults29.3%25.2–33.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.4%13.3–17.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.8%38.4–47.0
Obesity among adults38.8%31.7–45.8
Stroke among adults4.1%3.7–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.3%13.3–19.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%5.5–8.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.0%78.3–83.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.9%78.6–84.9
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%86.7–90.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.3%65.8–74.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.8%56.1–63.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.1%70.0–83.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.1–16.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.1%15.0–21.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults30.6%25.6–35.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.5%29.9–41.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults23.0%19.8–26.5
Frequent mental distress among adults20.0%17.5–22.5
Frequent physical distress among adults17.0%14.8–19.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.4–18.9
Any disability among adults35.4%30.6–39.9
Hearing disability among adults9.0%7.8–10.1
Independent living disability among adults9.8%8.4–11.1
Mobility disability among adults17.7%15.1–20.4
Self-care disability among adults4.2%3.6–4.8
Vision disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.6%18.2–25.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.3%10.8–16.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.7%12.0–17.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.3%8.6–12.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Loneliness among adults31.5%26.9–36.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.4%8.0–11.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–641.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)6.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)7.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle3.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription88.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)4.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate90.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households70.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+32.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age53.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$77,946$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$174,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.4 yr ± 1.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.54 years of 82.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured