Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

49084

in Riverside, MichiganPopulation 38

49.10/ 100

Ranked #17,516 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #560 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 42%)

Ranked #15 of 23 Niles, MI ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 0.10% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

17.4%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

71.4%

in the bottom 7.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US7th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

73.5%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST83rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.6%

in the top 10.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

2.8%

in the top 11.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

9.4 mi

in the top 12.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the bottom 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Riverside, Michigan (ZIP 49084) places in the bottom 45% nationally (17,516th) and the bottom 42% of Michigan (560th).

continue reading

The measures that define this area's challenges come through directly: modeled transportation noise registers in the top 3.3% nationally, and home broadband subscription settles in the bottom 7.0% nationally. Fiber broadband sits at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise lies in the top 10.9% nationally. On the stronger side, modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 0.10% nationally, poverty resides at the national minimum, and modeled expected annual loss is in the bottom 3.4% nationally. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled colon screening registers in the top 6.0% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 49085, about 5.6 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Niles, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 83%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 24%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 33%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 43%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 21%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 81%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 75%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 38%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 38%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults35.3%31.6–38.8
High blood pressure among adults41.7%37.3–45.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults12.0%10.7–13.3
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.3–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults9.3%7.9–10.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%7.9–11.7
Depression among adults25.2%21.7–28.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%11.6–15.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.3%34.3–42.5
Obesity among adults37.3%30.8–44.0
Stroke among adults4.6%3.9–5.3
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years9.3%7.5–11.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%5.5–9.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%76.8–82.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.2–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults88.9%86.9–90.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years73.5%69.2–77.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.1%64.0–70.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.9%68.0–81.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.4%11.9–17.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.8%11.6–18.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.2%22.1–32.3
Short sleep duration among adults36.5%31.3–42.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.8%17.2–24.5
Frequent mental distress among adults16.8%14.5–19.0
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%13.6–18.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%12.5–17.1
Any disability among adults36.7%31.5–41.6
Hearing disability among adults10.3%8.9–11.6
Independent living disability among adults9.5%7.9–11.1
Mobility disability among adults17.3%14.2–20.3
Self-care disability among adults4.4%3.6–5.1
Vision disability among adults5.5%4.7–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.6%18.7–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.9%11.0–17.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.7%9.8–15.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.8%8.6–13.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.9%6.5–9.2
Loneliness among adults31.0%26.0–36.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.7–9.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)14.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription71.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate76.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households44.4%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+26.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age44.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$54,375$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$165,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.6 yr ± 2.2178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.21 years of 78.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured