Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48449

in Lennon, MichiganPopulation 2,744

49.90/ 100

Ranked #16,397 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 49%)

Ranked #504 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 48%)

Ranked #11 of 25 Flint, MI ZIPs (top 44%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

45.9%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.28%

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST22nd
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US9th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Lennon, Michigan (ZIP 48449) ranks in the bottom 49% nationally (16,397th) and the bottom 48% of Michigan (504th).

continue reading

The burdens that read clearest in the data come first: modeled arsenic lands in the top 1.0% nationally, and poverty registers in the top 15% nationally. Recreation sits at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians rests at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs. Childcare is at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs. Better still, floodplain exposure stands in the bottom 8.5% nationally, and modeled disaster risk settles in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Crowded housing lies at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Households without a vehicle resides in the bottom 20% nationally, and homeownership lands in the top 22% nationally.

In plainer terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 48433, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Flint, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 78%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 46%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 49%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 47%

11%

Disability

healthier than 54%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 26%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 15%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 54%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 50%

13%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 37%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 46%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 54%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 13%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.7%29.1–34.3
High blood pressure among adults36.8%33.7–39.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.0%9.3–10.8
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.5–12.7
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.7%7.8–9.8
Depression among adults27.8%25.0–30.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.7%10.5–13.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%34.3–40.4
Obesity among adults38.0%32.9–43.1
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.4%8.8–12.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%5.1–7.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%75.2–79.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.9%77.5–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults87.7%86.2–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%66.6–73.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.4%66.9–71.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.1%70.3–81.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.6–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.8–17.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.6%21.4–27.9
Short sleep duration among adults36.3%32.0–40.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.3%17.2–21.6
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.6–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults15.1%13.6–16.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%13.2–16.4
Any disability among adults32.3%29.0–35.6
Hearing disability among adults8.0%7.3–8.8
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.7–9.5
Mobility disability among adults14.7%13.1–16.4
Self-care disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Vision disability among adults4.6%4.2–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.0%20.2–26.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%10.8–14.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.8%10.0–13.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.5–11.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.3–8.1
Loneliness among adults33.1%29.1–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.3%6.4–8.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate21.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–646.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)6.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle1.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription91.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate88.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population0.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households60.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+17.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age37.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$69,545$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$158,900$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,146$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.9 yr ± 0.9178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.91 years of 77.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured