Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48438

in Goodrich, MichiganPopulation 7,591

56.39/ 100

Ranked #7,878 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 25%)

Ranked #214 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #4 of 25 Flint, MI ZIPs (top 16%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

30%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

95%

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

72.6%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST75th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

6.8%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

4.9%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$106,796

in the top 15.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US85th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

The read

Goodrich, Michigan (ZIP 48438), in overall standing, comes out in the top 25% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,878th) and the top 22% of Michigan (214th).

continue reading

A few measures carry most of this area's good news: homeownership lands in the top 8.7% nationally, elder services rests in the top 10.8% nationally, and modeled colon screening settles in the top 8.5% nationally. Modeled tooth loss lands in the bottom 7.4% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility rests in the top 14.1% nationally, and modeled uninsured settles in the bottom 5.8% nationally. Poverty lands in the bottom 19% nationally, and modeled vision disability rests in the bottom 15% nationally. Set against that, modeled arsenic settles in the top 3.2% nationally. Fiber broadband lands at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Defined simply, for reference, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 48439, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Flint, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 65%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 71%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 63%

11%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 25%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 75%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 63%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 43%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 32%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 50%

14%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.0%27.6–32.5
High blood pressure among adults34.2%31.5–37.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.7%8.9–10.5
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.2–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.8–7.1
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.2%6.2–8.3
Depression among adults26.8%24.1–29.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%9.0–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened36.7%34.0–39.6
Obesity among adults35.8%32.0–39.9
Stroke among adults3.2%2.9–3.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.8%5.7–8.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years4.9%4.0–6.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%74.4–79.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%77.1–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%87.2–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.6%69.4–75.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.8%71.5–76.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%73.8–83.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%15.2–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.7%11.5–16.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.3%18.4–24.6
Short sleep duration among adults35.0%31.4–39.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.2%14.1–18.4
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%15.4–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults13.5%12.0–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.2%11.6–14.9
Any disability among adults28.9%25.8–32.3
Hearing disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.5
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.4–8.3
Mobility disability among adults12.5%10.9–14.3
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.3–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.7%18.8–24.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.9–12.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.6–11.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.3–10.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.4–7.1
Loneliness among adults32.5%28.7–36.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.4–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–645.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)36.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle1.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription94.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate95.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population2.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households62.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+18.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age43.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$106,796$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$337,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,313$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.8 yr ± 2.1278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.12 years of 79.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured