Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48436

in Gaines, MichiganPopulation 4,131

54.34/ 100

Ranked #10,262 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 32%)

Ranked #296 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranked #5 of 25 Flint, MI ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

38%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

75.1%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

12.6%

in the bottom 13.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

4.2%

in the bottom 14.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.3%

in the bottom 8.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST19th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Gaines, Michigan (ZIP 48436) sits in the top 32% healthiest ZIPs nationally (10,262nd) and the top 30% of Michigan (296th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: modeled colon screening is in the top 2.9% nationally, housing-cost burden rests in the bottom 13.5% nationally, and homeownership sits in the top 13.9% nationally. Poverty registers in the bottom 14.8% nationally, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 16% nationally, and modeled mammography resides in the top 15% nationally. Working the other way, modeled arsenic lies in the top 1.9% nationally. Fiber broadband settles at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Walkability stands in the bottom 17% nationally. Recreation is at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. ZIP 48451, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Flint, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 62%

11%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 59%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 44%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 59%

14%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 69%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Disability

healthier than 75%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 47%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 59%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 88%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 79%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.6%28.2–33.2
High blood pressure among adults34.5%31.8–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.9%9.1–10.8
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.3–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.0–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.6%6.7–8.6
Depression among adults27.4%24.7–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.4%9.2–11.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.3%34.5–40.3
Obesity among adults36.1%32.3–40.3
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.6%7.2–10.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.3%4.4–6.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.6–79.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.6%77.0–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults88.5%87.0–89.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years75.1%71.9–78.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.5%70.1–74.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.3%74.4–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.9–19.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%12.2–16.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.9%19.0–24.9
Short sleep duration among adults35.2%31.4–39.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.8%14.7–19.0
Frequent mental distress among adults17.8%16.0–19.7
Frequent physical distress among adults14.0%12.5–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.8%12.1–15.4
Any disability among adults30.1%27.0–33.4
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.7
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.7–8.5
Mobility disability among adults13.0%11.4–14.8
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
Vision disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.8%19.8–26.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.3–13.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults9.5%7.9–11.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.7–10.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.6–7.3
Loneliness among adults34.0%30.0–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–645.1%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)5.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)19.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)4.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle4.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription88.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate91.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population1.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households56.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+13.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age40.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$94,487$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$276,000$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,267$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.8 yr ± 0.9478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.94 years of 77.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured