Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

13208

in Syracuse, New YorkPopulation 22,993

35.69/ 100

Ranked #29,111 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 9.3%)

Ranked #1,717 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 0.8%)

Ranked #87 of 87 Syracuse, NY ZIPs (bottom 1.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transit access

13 per 1,000 residents

in the top 0.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

11 ppb

in the top 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

US98th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

14.0%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

26%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

7.1%

in the top 5.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

17.5%

in the top 3.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

25.3%

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

34%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.5%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

17.6%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 13208, one of several in Syracuse, New York lands in the bottom 9.3% nationally (29,111th) and the bottom 0.8% of New York (1,717th).

continue reading

Several measures weigh most on this area's profile, and they come first: lead in tap water rests in the top 1.8% nationally, and modeled independent living disability stands in the top 4.1% nationally. Households without a vehicle lies in the top 3.0% nationally, and modeled self-care disability lands in the top 5.4% nationally. Modeled transportation sits in the top 3.7% nationally, housing insecurity is in the top 3.9% nationally, and food insecurity settles in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled vision disability resides in the top 6.0% nationally, and utility shutoff registers in the top 4.1% nationally. On the better side, transit rests in the top 0.8% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 13088, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Syracuse, NY metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 18%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 16%

8%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 87%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 1%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 1%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 33%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

in the bottom 0.00%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 5%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.8 ± 1.4 years. The 44 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 80.8 years — 4.0 years below them.

    Ranked #3,034 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.7%24.3–29.2
High blood pressure among adults39.5%36.4–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.5%5.9–7.1
Current asthma among adults12.7%11.4–14.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%7.0–8.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.5%9.5–11.5
Depression among adults23.3%20.5–26.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults15.1%13.5–16.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.0%32.0–38.3
Obesity among adults43.1%38.5–47.9
Stroke among adults4.6%4.3–4.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years26.0%22.4–29.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.6%10.1–13.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.9%72.3–77.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%77.2–82.7
Cholesterol screening among adults82.6%80.8–84.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years59.3%54.9–63.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults47.5%44.2–50.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.6%68.1–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.9%11.8–16.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.3%19.0–23.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.4%32.5–40.3
Short sleep duration among adults43.7%39.2–48.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.6%25.8–31.3
Frequent mental distress among adults21.3%19.2–23.5
Frequent physical distress among adults18.0%16.3–19.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.5%17.6–21.5
Any disability among adults37.8%34.2–41.4
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Independent living disability among adults14.0%12.7–15.3
Mobility disability among adults19.6%17.6–21.7
Self-care disability among adults7.1%6.5–7.7
Vision disability among adults9.5%8.7–10.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults30.9%27.2–34.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults34.0%30.8–37.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults35.7%32.8–38.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.3%22.7–27.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.5%15.8–19.3
Loneliness among adults38.3%33.8–42.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults17.6%15.7–19.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate32.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734
Uninsured 18–648.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2865.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734
No HS diploma (25+)22.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743
Bachelor's or higher (25+)18.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50531.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743
Unemployment rate (16+)8.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730
Households without a vehicle26.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730
Broadband subscription89.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32291.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)40.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32227.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730
Homeownership rate49.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32280.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730
Crowded housing (>1 per room)5.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730
Foreign-born population21.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5534.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746
Single-parent households34.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716
Population 65+11.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746
Median age34.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733
Median household income$44,712$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626
Median home value$123,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629
Median gross rent$1,037$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)NY median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.8 yr ± 0.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30880.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.70 years of 76.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured