ZIP code
48218
in River Rouge, MichiganPopulation 7,011
22.35/ 100
Ranked #31,720 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.1%)
Ranked #973 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (bottom 0.2%)
Ranked #215 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (bottom 0.5%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Self-care disability
9.8%
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.
Full methodology ›Independent-living disability
17.6%
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.
Full methodology ›Vision disability
12.7%
in the top 1.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.
Full methodology ›Fair or poor health
38.7%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.
Full methodology ›Utility shut-off threat
27.9%
in the top 0.3% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Short sleep
48.2%
in the top 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.
Full methodology ›Housing insecurity
33.4%
in the top 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Food insecurity
46.5%
in the top 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›Tooth loss
30.8%
in the top 2.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS97thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.
Full methodology ›Lack of transportation
23.2%
in the top 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.
Full methodology ›The read
River Rouge, Michigan (ZIP 48218), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 1.1% nationally (31,720th) and the bottom 0.2% of Michigan (973rd).
The data is direct about where this area carries real strain: modeled self-care disability lands in the top 0.8% nationally, independent living disability is in the top 0.8% nationally, and vision disability resides in the top 1.5% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the top 1.0% nationally, utility shutoff lies in the top 0.3% nationally, and short sleep sits in the top 0.8% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity settles in the top 0.6% nationally, and food insecurity registers in the top 0.7% nationally. Modeled tooth loss stands in the top 2.7% nationally, and transportation lands in the top 1.0% nationally.
Held up against its neighbors, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 48209, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 90%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 63%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 4%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
in the bottom 0.8%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 11%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 12%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the bottom 0.4%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 3%
8%
Disability
healthier than 1%
7%
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 70%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 67%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 2%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 2%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 4%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 2%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the bottom 0.00%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 2%
8%
Disability
in the bottom 0.5%
7%
Lifting this score
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 77%
5%
About typical
Healthcare Access
healthier than 48%
5%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 2%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 7%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 10%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 2%
13%
Risk Behavior
in the bottom 0.00%
11%
Mental Health
in the bottom 1.0%
8%
Disability
in the bottom 0.00%
7%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Below what income predicts
The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes
Estimated life expectancy is 70.5 ± 2.0 years. A median household income of $41,033 predicts 76.6 years — 6.1 years below.
Ranked #5,747 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.
Below its nearby ZIPs
The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors
Estimated life expectancy is 70.5 ± 2.0 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 74.4 years — 3.9 years below them.
Ranked #2,985 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
48209
Michiganshares a border
Score 31.03
Closest healthier
48229
Michiganshares a border
Score 29.30
Similar health profile
43211
Ohio100% similar profile
Score 23.90
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 32.4% | 30.2–34.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 46.6% | 44.1–49.3 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 5.9% | 5.3–6.4 |
| Current asthma among adults | 14.2% | 12.8–15.6 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 9.4% | 8.6–10.3 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 14.5% | 13.1–16.0 |
| Depression among adults | 26.5% | 24.1–29.2 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 20.1% | 18.4–22.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 36.6% | 34.1–39.1 |
| Obesity among adults | 46.8% | 43.2–50.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 6.5% | 5.9–7.0 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 30.8% | 26.9–35.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 14.9% | 12.9–17.1 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 76.7% | 74.5–78.8 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 79.8% | 77.5–82.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 82.1% | 80.1–83.9 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 57.3% | 53.6–60.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 45.7% | 42.9–48.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 72.0% | 66.7–77.1 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 12.4% | 10.8–14.3 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 27.7% | 24.8–30.6 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 43.5% | 39.9–47.2 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 48.2% | 44.9–51.5 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 38.7% | 35.5–41.8 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 24.9% | 22.8–27.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 21.5% | 19.5–23.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 23.2% | 20.9–25.3 |
| Any disability among adults | 45.9% | 42.5–49.2 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.0% | 7.2–8.9 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 17.6% | 15.9–19.3 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 25.3% | 23.1–27.6 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 9.8% | 8.9–10.7 |
| Vision disability among adults | 12.7% | 11.6–13.9 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 31.7% | 28.7–34.9 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 46.5% | 43.0–50.0 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 51.3% | 47.8–54.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 33.4% | 30.6–36.5 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 23.2% | 21.1–25.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 36.5% | 33.2–40.2 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 27.9% | 25.4–30.4 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 39.8% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 10.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 17.2% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 6.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 22.2% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 6.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 6.6% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 22.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 11.4% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974 |
| Households without a vehicle | 11.9% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 4.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973 |
| Broadband subscription | 80.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 88.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 35.4% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 22.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973 |
| Homeownership rate | 57.3% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 85.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 3.8% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973 |
| Foreign-born population | 8.2% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 1.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975 |
| Single-parent households | 39.1% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 56.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970 |
| Population 65+ | 12.7% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975 |
| Median age | 34.4 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974 |
| Median household income | $41,033 | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962 |
| Median home value | $65,200 | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952 |
| Median gross rent | $839 | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $972 ($719–$1,368) n=849 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MI median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 70.5 yr ± 1.01 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 78.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.01 years of 70.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured