Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

48128

in Dearborn, MichiganPopulation 12,624

57.39/ 100

Ranked #6,892 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 21%)

Ranked #187 of 973 Michigan ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranked #82 of 215 Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI ZIPs (top 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Dental provider access

1.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

140 intersections/sq mi

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

6 ppb

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

US92nd
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

5.4%

in the bottom 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Park land

15.8%

in the top 8.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST88th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.3%

in the top 13.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

5.4%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST21st
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

31.2%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 48128, one of several in Dearborn, Michigan, overall, ranks in the top 21% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,892nd) and the top 19% of Michigan (187th).

continue reading

This area's strengths are easy to pick out across the measures: dental providers sits in the top 3.1% nationally, walkability lands in the top 6.2% nationally, and modeled tooth loss lies in the bottom 3.0% nationally. Park land stands in the top 8.5% nationally, pharmacy rests in the top 10.9% nationally, and physicians registers in the top 16% nationally. Modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 16% nationally. Working the other way, lead in tap water settles in the top 7.7% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise is in the top 13.8% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 13.9% nationally.

Measured against the nearby ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 48150, about 2.4 miles away, comes out healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 77%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 64%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 70%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 86%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 82%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 55%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 52%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 29%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Disability

healthier than 61%

7%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 56%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 34%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 31%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.1 ± 2.1 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.1 years — 5.0 years above them.

    Ranked #150 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.2%25.1–29.4
High blood pressure among adults32.6%30.2–35.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.1–9.6
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.1–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults6.1%5.4–6.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.3%6.3–8.4
Depression among adults26.8%24.3–29.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults9.8%8.6–11.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.2%32.8–37.8
Obesity among adults31.2%27.9–34.6
Stroke among adults3.1%2.7–3.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years5.4%4.4–6.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%4.3–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.0%72.6–77.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.1%76.6–81.5
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%85.8–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.9%66.8–73.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults71.7%69.3–73.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.7%73.0–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.6%15.4–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.0%10.9–15.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.3%18.6–24.2
Short sleep duration among adults34.5%31.5–37.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.0%14.9–19.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.2%16.3–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.0%11.5–14.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.0%11.3–14.9
Any disability among adults27.7%24.8–30.8
Hearing disability among adults6.5%5.8–7.3
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.7–8.7
Mobility disability among adults11.6%10.1–13.2
Self-care disability among adults3.2%2.8–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.1%3.6–4.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.3%17.6–23.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.3%10.0–14.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults11.2%8.9–13.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.3–11.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.1–8.3
Loneliness among adults29.3%26.0–32.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.4%6.3–8.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate14.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (4.3–22.3%) n=974
Uninsured 18–645.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2866.8% (2.5–13.5%) n=975
No HS diploma (25+)7.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5056.7% (2.5–14.2%) n=974
Bachelor's or higher (25+)53.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50522.1% (11.4–48.3%) n=974
Unemployment rate (16+)2.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.6% (1.3–10.0%) n=974
Households without a vehicle4.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.5% (0.9–10.8%) n=973
Broadband subscription92.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (79.5–95.5%) n=973
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.5% (14.8–32.9%) n=973
Homeownership rate85.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32285.3% (62.2–94.6%) n=973
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–3.6%) n=973
Foreign-born population21.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.8% (0.3–10.0%) n=975
Single-parent households45.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08756.5% (43.6–74.2%) n=970
Population 65+15.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (13.7–35.2%) n=975
Median age35.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (35.2–58.2) n=974
Median household income$101,037$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$68,216 ($47,282–$105,129) n=962
Median home value$258,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$192,350 ($116,360–$355,650) n=952
Median gross rent$1,533$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$972 ($719–$1,368) n=849
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MI median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 1.0678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.6 yr (75.7–81.6) n=940

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.06 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured