Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47235

in Freetown, IndianaPopulation 1,672

52.01/ 100

Ranked #13,433 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #176 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

29.9%

in the top 4.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

98.8%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Unemployment rate

12.3%

in the top 6.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

71.2%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.56 per 1,000 residents

in the top 10.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.48%

in the bottom 14.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a community health center

10.9 mi

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest federally funded community health center, which serves patients regardless of ability to pay.

Full methodology ›

The read

Freetown, Indiana (ZIP 47235), in overall standing, comes out in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,433rd) and the top 23% of Indiana (176th).

continue reading

The measures that most flatter this area set the tone for the rest: park land lies in the top 4.7% nationally, fiber broadband registers in the top 5.1% nationally, and modeled tree cover is in the top 8.6% nationally. Homeownership lies in the top 10.4% nationally, civic registers in the top 10.8% nationally, and modeled disaster risk is in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Crowded housing registers at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Modeled transportation noise is in the bottom 14.9% nationally. Against that, unemployment lies in the top 6.0% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 47448, about 1.3 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 59%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 53%

11%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 38%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 93%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 71%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 78%

8%

Disability

healthier than 77%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.5%28.7–34.3
High blood pressure among adults39.0%35.5–42.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%9.1–10.7
Current asthma among adults10.9%9.9–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.3%6.5–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.4%7.3–9.4
Depression among adults25.5%22.5–28.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.9%11.4–14.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.6%36.1–43.1
Obesity among adults38.3%32.4–44.4
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.1%11.2–15.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.6–8.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.6%77.2–81.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.6%77.8–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults88.1%86.6–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.4%64.8–72.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults59.6%56.4–62.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.0%69.0–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%14.0–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.1%13.6–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.6%20.1–27.0
Short sleep duration among adults35.3%30.4–40.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.0%16.6–21.3
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.8–18.2
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.2–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.6%12.0–15.1
Any disability among adults29.8%26.3–33.3
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.9–8.5
Independent living disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.2
Mobility disability among adults14.1%12.3–15.8
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.8–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.4%18.6–24.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.9%9.0–12.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.1%4.9–7.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.6%7.3–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.1–6.8
Loneliness among adults30.6%26.9–35.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.5%5.6–7.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate17.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6414.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)16.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)12.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle3.8%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription83.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)22.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate93.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households80.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+23.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age54.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$73,963$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$240,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$687$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.3 yr ± 1.1578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.15 years of 78.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured