Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47264

in Norman, IndianaPopulation 1,574

51.03/ 100

Ranked #14,814 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #222 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 29%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

41.4%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

73.3%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

95.6%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

8.3 mi

in the top 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

15%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

3.8 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 23% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US23rd
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

5.9 mi

in the top 25% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US75th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.34%

in the top 26% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US74th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Norman, Indiana (ZIP 47264) lands in the top 46% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,814th) and the top 29% of Indiana (222nd).

continue reading

This area's most favorable readings come through plainly in the numbers: park land lands in the top 3.2% nationally, and modeled tree cover lies in the top 7.7% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband rests in the top 9.9% nationally. Crowded housing registers at the national minimum, shared with about 29% of ZIPs. Homeownership resides in the top 17% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure settles at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. On the other side, distance to a nursing home is in the top 15% nationally. Recreation sits at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Physicians lands at the national minimum, shared with about 38% of ZIPs.

Against the wider neighborhood, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, outer-floodplain exposure is land with a lower but real 1-in-500 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "500-year floodplain". On the overall standing, ZIP 47201, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 69%

13%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 57%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Disability

healthier than 58%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 54%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 68%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 90%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 82%

8%

Disability

healthier than 60%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 38%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 7%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.3%29.3–35.1
High blood pressure among adults40.0%36.3–43.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.1%9.3–11.0
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.7–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.2–8.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.9%7.6–10.1
Depression among adults24.9%21.8–28.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.7%12.0–15.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.5%36.9–44.3
Obesity among adults39.1%32.8–45.3
Stroke among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.5%13.3–18.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.9%5.6–8.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.5%78.2–82.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%77.5–83.2
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.5–89.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years69.0%65.1–73.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults62.3%59.3–65.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%67.5–79.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.2%13.7–18.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.9%13.3–18.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.4%20.6–28.4
Short sleep duration among adults34.4%29.6–39.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.9%17.1–22.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.7–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.4–15.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.0%12.3–15.8
Any disability among adults31.3%27.4–35.3
Hearing disability among adults8.4%7.5–9.2
Independent living disability among adults7.7%6.7–8.6
Mobility disability among adults14.9%12.8–16.8
Self-care disability among adults3.7%3.2–4.1
Vision disability among adults4.5%4.0–5.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.8%18.7–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.2%9.2–13.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.1%4.9–7.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.1–10.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.1
Loneliness among adults31.4%27.2–35.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.4–7.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–641.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)15.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)1.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription89.3%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate90.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population12.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households32.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+17.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age37.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$57,917$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$133,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.2 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 78.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured