ZIP code
13352
in Hinckley, New YorkPopulation 25
56.60/ 100
Ranked #7,649 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 24%)
Ranked #901 of 1,730 New York ZIPs (bottom 48%)
Ranked #23 of 64 Utica-Rome, NY ZIPs (top 36%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 1.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
0.00%
at the national minimum
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Homeownership rate
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.
Full methodology ›Colon-cancer screening
77%
in the top 1.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
100%
at the national maximum
Higher is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 3.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST3rdUS4thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
4.3%
in the bottom 2.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS3rdDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›Distance to a nursing home
14.2 mi
in the top 6.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST97thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
4.7%
in the bottom 7.0% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST6thUS7thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›The read
Hinckley, New York (ZIP 13352) ranks in the top 24% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,649th) and the bottom 48% of New York (901st), based on limited data; treat as directional.
A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled disaster risk settles in the bottom 1.0% nationally, and housing-cost burden rests at the national minimum. Poverty lands at the national minimum, and homeownership settles at the national maximum. Modeled colon screening rests in the top 1.1% nationally, home broadband subscription lands at the national maximum, and modeled expected annual loss settles in the bottom 3.6% nationally. Modeled hearing disability rests in the bottom 2.8% nationally. Unemployment lands at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. On the other side, distance to a nursing home settles in the top 6.0% nationally.
For context, disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 13435, just across the boundary.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Utica-Rome, NY metro area.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 66%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 86%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 97%
13%
Disability
healthier than 85%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 93%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 52%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 60%
11%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 27%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 7%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 61%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 93%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 88%
13%
Disability
healthier than 64%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
healthier than 91%
5%
About typical
Risk Behavior
healthier than 49%
11%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 26%
21%
Mental Health
healthier than 3%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 6%
5%
Lifting this score
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 73%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 85%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 93%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 83%
11%
Disability
healthier than 87%
7%
Climate / Disaster RiskPartial
in the top 0.4%
5%
About typical
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 47%
21%
Holding it back
Mental Health
healthier than 3%
8%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 9%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
13324
New Yorkshares a border
Score 54.67
Closest healthier
13435
New Yorkshares a border
Score 56.63
Similar health profile
16422
Pennsylvania99% similar profile
Score 54.85
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 31.8% | 27.8–35.7 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 32.1% | 27.9–36.4 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 9.9% | 8.6–11.2 |
| Current asthma among adults | 13.0% | 11.3–14.8 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 4.7% | 3.8–5.7 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 7.2% | 5.0–9.7 |
| Depression among adults | 25.6% | 21.7–29.7 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 9.2% | 7.3–11.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 37.7% | 33.6–41.9 |
| Obesity among adults | 36.2% | 29.5–42.9 |
| Stroke among adults | 2.9% | 2.2–3.6 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 22.0% | 18.0–26.3 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 3.7% | 2.2–6.7 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 79.2% | 75.7–82.4 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 83.1% | 79.7–86.0 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 92.6% | 90.0–94.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 77.0% | 73.0–80.8 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 66.4% | 63.1–69.5 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 78.7% | 72.4–84.5 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 15.3% | 12.5–18.4 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 12.8% | 8.3–17.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 24.0% | 17.9–30.8 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 38.5% | 33.3–43.9 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 14.7% | 10.8–19.4 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 17.8% | 14.2–21.1 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 13.4% | 10.5–16.5 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 11.9% | 8.7–15.6 |
| Any disability among adults | 24.7% | 19.2–30.5 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 4.3% | 3.6–5.1 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 7.6% | 5.5–9.9 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 12.5% | 9.2–16.5 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 3.2% | 2.3–4.3 |
| Vision disability among adults | 3.7% | 2.7–4.8 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 19.4% | 15.0–24.0 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 11.0% | 6.6–16.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 11.6% | 6.5–18.0 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 10.5% | 6.7–14.7 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 6.1% | 4.2–8.5 |
| Loneliness among adults | 31.5% | 26.0–37.0 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 6.3% | 4.3–8.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 0.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 9.5% (2.5–22.6%) n=1,734 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 5.0% (0.0–13.1%) n=1,734 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 7.1% (1.2–17.5%) n=1,743 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 31.8% (13.9–62.1%) n=1,743 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.4% (0.0–9.7%) n=1,730 |
| Households without a vehicle | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 5.7% (0.0–28.9%) n=1,730 |
| Broadband subscription | 100.0% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 91.5% (81.1–98.3%) n=1,730 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 0.0% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 27.2% (14.2–45.5%) n=1,730 |
| Homeownership rate | 100.0% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 80.2% (40.9–94.8%) n=1,730 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.0% (0.0–6.6%) n=1,730 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 4.8% (0.0–28.7%) n=1,746 |
| Single-parent households | 0.0% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 54.0% (36.7–74.5%) n=1,716 |
| Population 65+ | 40.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 20.0% (12.0–33.2%) n=1,746 |
| Median age | 13.8 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 43.5 yr (34.6–56.1) n=1,733 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $81,837 ($55,470–$145,610) n=1,626 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $247,700 ($121,180–$801,380) n=1,629 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $1,162 ($782–$2,359) n=1,367 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | NY median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 81.5 yr ± 1.42 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 80.9 yr (78.0–84.5) n=1,692 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.42 years of 81.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured