Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

47274

in Seymour, IndianaPopulation 33,068

46.59/ 100

Ranked #20,647 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 36%)

Ranked #470 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 38%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

7.7 ppb

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

US95th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

333 units

in the top 7.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Mental-health provider access

0.12 per 1,000 residents

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

31%

in the top 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

71.6%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

In its overall standing, Seymour, Indiana (ZIP 47274) lands in the bottom 36% nationally (20,647th) and the bottom 38% of Indiana (470th).

continue reading

This area's measures are easy to read as a mixed set: distance to an emergency room is at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Subsidized affordable housing sits in the top 7.3% nationally, and mental-health providers lands in the top 8.7% nationally. Distance to a community health center lies at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Distance to a nursing home stands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Set against that, distance to a Superfund site rests at the national minimum, and modeled expected annual loss registers in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled disaster risk resides in the top 4.4% nationally, and lead in tap water settles in the top 5.3% nationally. Floodplain exposure is in the top 9.6% nationally.

Against the wider neighborhood, expected annual loss runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Put simply, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. On the overall standing, ZIP 47201, just across the boundary, ranks healthier.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 56%

16%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 35%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 24%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 58%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 34%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Disability

healthier than 39%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.2 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $71,457 predicts 78.8 years — 2.5 years below.

    Ranked #3,466 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.8%25.8–31.9
High blood pressure among adults36.8%32.9–40.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.6–9.1
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.7–9.5
Depression among adults25.8%22.3–29.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.1%11.5–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%33.6–41.7
Obesity among adults40.1%33.0–47.4
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.3%16.1–22.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years12.2%10.7–13.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.0%74.3–79.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.3%74.8–81.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.6%82.7–86.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.2%61.5–70.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.2%53.7–60.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%63.6–78.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.4%13.6–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.4%15.2–19.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.4%23.4–31.7
Short sleep duration among adults36.0%30.1–42.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.5%20.0–25.3
Frequent mental distress among adults18.0%16.1–20.0
Frequent physical distress among adults14.5%12.9–16.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.2%14.5–18.0
Any disability among adults32.7%28.8–36.9
Hearing disability among adults7.5%6.7–8.4
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.9–9.7
Mobility disability among adults15.0%13.3–16.9
Self-care disability among adults4.0%3.7–4.4
Vision disability among adults5.6%5.1–6.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.8%20.4–27.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.0%14.9–19.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.5–11.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.8%11.2–14.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.6–9.6
Loneliness among adults33.5%28.7–38.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.8–10.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6411.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)13.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle7.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription86.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate66.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population12.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households49.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+14.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age37.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$71,457$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$188,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,017$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 0.4978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.49 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured