Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46701

in Albion, IndianaPopulation 7,944

51.24/ 100

Ranked #14,490 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 45%)

Ranked #210 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Mental-health provider access

0.26 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of mental-health clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.8 pCi/L

in the top 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

29.9%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Albion, Indiana (ZIP 46701) sits in the top 45% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,490th) and the top 28% of Indiana (210th).

continue reading

Where this area does well, the measures make it plain: mental-health providers resides in the top 2.7% nationally. Distance to a community health center lies at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Fiber broadband settles in the top 15% nationally, and housing-cost burden stands in the bottom 15% nationally. Outpatient is in the top 21% nationally, and modeled loneliness rests in the bottom 22% nationally. Against that, modeled industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 3.0% nationally, and radon registers in the top 13.1% nationally. Modeled arsenic lands in the top 12.7% nationally, and transportation noise resides in the top 17% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. ZIP 46710, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 66%

16%

Disability

healthier than 63%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 68%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 43%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 58%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 42%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 22%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 64%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 72%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 67%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 83%

8%

Disability

healthier than 71%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.8%26.6–33.2
High blood pressure among adults37.9%33.9–42.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.6%8.7–10.5
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.4–9.5
Depression among adults24.0%20.7–27.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.1–14.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.4%35.2–43.8
Obesity among adults38.6%31.5–46.2
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.0%13.1–19.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.7%6.4–9.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.9%75.1–80.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%76.7–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults86.8%85.1–88.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.1%62.3–71.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults63.0%59.4–66.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%66.0–80.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.0%14.2–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.8%13.6–18.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults24.2%20.3–28.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%29.7–41.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.5%16.9–22.2
Frequent mental distress among adults17.0%15.1–19.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.1%12.4–15.9
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.5%12.8–16.3
Any disability among adults30.9%26.9–35.2
Hearing disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.6
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.8–8.6
Mobility disability among adults14.0%12.2–16.0
Self-care disability among adults3.5%3.1–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.4%4.0–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.0%18.4–25.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.5%9.5–13.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.3%5.2–7.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.1%7.7–10.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.3
Loneliness among adults29.9%25.0–35.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.6%5.6–7.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–647.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)7.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)26.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)4.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle2.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription91.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)13.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate83.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households63.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+18.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age42.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$78,385$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$211,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$850$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.3 yr ± 1.1378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.13 years of 78.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured