Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46710

in Avilla, IndianaPopulation 4,506

51.88/ 100

Ranked #13,610 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)

Ranked #182 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

96.6%

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.8 pCi/L

in the top 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

4.4 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Avilla, Indiana (ZIP 46710) lands in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,610th) and the top 24% of Indiana (182nd).

continue reading

A number of measures place this area on solid footing: fiber broadband lies in the top 8.6% nationally, and housing-cost burden lands in the bottom 12.8% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Poverty is in the bottom 13.8% nationally, and fatal road crashes settles in the bottom 17% nationally. By contrast, modeled industrial-pollution burden resides in the top 5.6% nationally, and radon registers in the top 13.1% nationally. Recreation rests at the national minimum, shared with about 35% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic stands in the top 19% nationally. Childcare lies at the national minimum, shared with about 42% of ZIPs.

Set beside the nearby areas, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 46763, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 61%

16%

Disability

healthier than 67%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 55%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 51%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 28%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 64%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 73%

8%

Disability

healthier than 78%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 46%

13%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 53%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.0%26.0–32.3
High blood pressure among adults36.3%32.6–40.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.3
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%6.9–9.1
Depression among adults24.7%21.4–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults11.9%10.4–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.3%34.4–42.4
Obesity among adults38.3%31.6–45.3
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years14.5%11.9–17.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.3%5.9–8.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.2%74.3–79.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%76.5–82.9
Cholesterol screening among adults87.0%85.0–88.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.8%62.2–71.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults64.3%61.0–67.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.6%64.8–79.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.3–20.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults15.6%13.2–18.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.7%19.8–27.9
Short sleep duration among adults35.4%29.6–41.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.7%16.1–21.7
Frequent mental distress among adults17.4%15.3–19.5
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%12.1–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.6%12.7–16.5
Any disability among adults30.2%26.2–34.4
Hearing disability among adults7.2%6.4–8.0
Independent living disability among adults7.6%6.6–8.6
Mobility disability among adults13.5%11.5–15.6
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.7
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.7–4.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.1%18.5–25.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.1%9.0–13.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.9%4.8–7.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.0%7.5–10.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.2%5.3–7.2
Loneliness among adults30.5%25.6–35.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.5–7.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–646.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)9.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)20.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)2.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription91.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)12.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate80.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households54.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+18.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age40.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$84,408$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$218,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$759$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.4 yr ± 0.7478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.74 years of 77.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured