Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46222

in Indianapolis, IndianaPopulation 38,887

32.95/ 100

Ranked #30,055 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.3%)

Ranked #738 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 2.6%)

Ranked #113 of 115 Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN ZIPs (bottom 1.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Utility shut-off threat

20%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

44.8%

in the top 3.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

27.5%

in the top 4.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

9.9%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

19.5%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

35.1%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

548 units

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

17.1%

in the top 4.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

25%

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

31.3%

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 46222, one of several in Indianapolis, Indiana, on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 6.3% nationally (30,055th) and the bottom 2.6% of Indiana (738th).

continue reading

The profile cuts both ways, and the readings bear that out: subsidized affordable housing lands in the top 4.0% nationally. Working the other way, modeled utility shutoff resides in the top 2.6% nationally, short sleep lies in the top 3.4% nationally, and tooth loss settles in the top 4.8% nationally. Modeled vision disability stands in the top 5.1% nationally, and uninsured is in the top 4.9% nationally. Modeled food insecurity rests in the top 3.5% nationally, and transportation sits in the top 4.0% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity registers in the top 4.1% nationally, and fair or poor health lands in the top 6.2% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 46202, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 94%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 29%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 35%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 91%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 36%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 0.00%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.6 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $50,783 predicts 77.4 years — 5.8 years below.

    Ranked #5,711 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.6 ± 1.1 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.5 years — 5.8 years below them.

    Ranked #3,524 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults24.8%23.1–26.6
High blood pressure among adults41.0%38.7–43.3
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults4.7%4.3–5.1
Current asthma among adults12.6%11.4–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.6%8.7–10.5
Depression among adults26.2%23.9–28.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.8%15.4–18.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.1%32.9–37.4
Obesity among adults45.0%41.8–48.4
Stroke among adults4.4%4.1–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years27.5%24.2–30.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years19.5%17.4–21.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.8%71.6–75.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.1%74.8–79.4
Cholesterol screening among adults79.7%77.7–81.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.8%53.3–60.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults45.3%42.6–47.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.0%69.0–78.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.6%14.7–18.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.9%19.0–23.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.2%31.4–37.0
Short sleep duration among adults44.8%41.7–47.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults31.3%29.0–33.7
Frequent mental distress among adults21.2%19.5–23.1
Frequent physical distress among adults17.2%15.7–18.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.2%19.4–23.1
Any disability among adults38.5%35.8–41.4
Hearing disability among adults6.2%5.6–6.9
Independent living disability among adults12.6%11.5–13.8
Mobility disability among adults19.0%17.4–20.6
Self-care disability among adults6.7%6.2–7.3
Vision disability among adults9.9%9.1–10.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.4%26.8–32.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.1%32.3–38.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults26.0%23.5–28.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults25.0%22.7–27.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults17.1%15.5–18.9
Loneliness among adults39.2%36.4–42.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults20.0%18.1–22.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6422.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)23.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)9.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle10.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription88.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate48.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population23.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households32.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+9.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age31.4 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$50,783$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$116,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,069$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.6 yr ± 0.5578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.55 years of 71.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured