Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46075

in Whitestown, IndianaPopulation 9,509

65.77/ 100

Ranked #1,713 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.4%)

Ranked #7 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 1.0%)

Ranked #7 of 115 Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN ZIPs (top 6.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

50.9%

in the top 0.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.7%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.9%

in the bottom 2.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

4.3%

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

7.7%

in the bottom 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.1%

in the bottom 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

2.0%

in the bottom 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

27.4%

in the bottom 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

8.0%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

12.5%

in the bottom 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Whitestown, Indiana (ZIP 46075) places in the top 5.4% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,713th) and the top 1.0% of Indiana (7th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: modeled coronary heart disease settles in the bottom 2.5% nationally, and stroke sits in the bottom 2.0% nationally. Modeled hearing disability lies in the bottom 2.8% nationally, and mobility disability rests in the bottom 2.7% nationally. Modeled independent living disability resides in the bottom 3.1% nationally, self-care disability is in the bottom 2.1% nationally, and high blood pressure lands in the bottom 5.2% nationally. Modeled diabetes stands in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and fair or poor health registers in the bottom 4.6% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled arsenic settles in the top 0.7% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, arsenic runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For readers new to these terms, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 46077, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 95%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 90%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 99%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 98%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 96%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 86%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 85%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 82.4 ± 3.1 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 78.4 years — 4.0 years above them.

    Ranked #362 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 33.8; chronic-disease standing 94.6 (top 10%) — 61 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #15,498 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults19.5%17.5–22.2
High blood pressure among adults27.4%24.6–31.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.4%5.9–7.1
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.4–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults3.7%3.4–4.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults4.3%3.7–4.9
Depression among adults22.4%19.7–26.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults8.0%7.1–9.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.0%28.9–36.4
Obesity among adults32.0%27.1–39.2
Stroke among adults1.9%1.7–2.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years7.4%5.9–8.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.4%4.4–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure71.1%68.3–74.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.5%75.5–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults87.5%85.7–89.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.4%65.8–74.6
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.6%67.4–73.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.5%72.7–85.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.7%16.0–22.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults10.4%8.6–12.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults16.2%13.6–19.6
Short sleep duration among adults31.9%26.4–37.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.5%10.8–14.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.6%13.9–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults9.6%8.5–11.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.4%9.9–13.1
Any disability among adults21.2%18.4–24.9
Hearing disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.9
Independent living disability among adults5.1%4.4–5.8
Mobility disability among adults7.7%6.7–9.0
Self-care disability among adults2.0%1.8–2.2
Vision disability among adults2.7%2.4–3.0
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.5%17.4–23.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.8–10.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.1%3.2–5.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.5–9.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.3–5.8
Loneliness among adults29.0%24.6–33.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.6–6.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–644.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)3.6%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)57.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)2.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle0.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription97.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)27.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate76.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population9.6%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households45.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+10.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age32.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$117,002$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$355,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$2,034$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth82.4 yr ± 1.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.58 years of 82.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured