Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46327

in Hammond, IndianaPopulation 10,597

33.21/ 100

Ranked #29,993 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 6.5%)

Ranked #737 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 2.7%)

Ranked #363 of 374 Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN ZIPs (bottom 3.0%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Uninsured (under 65)

23.1%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

45.4%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45.9%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

33.9%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

10.3%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

4.3%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

28.1%

in the top 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

35.6%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

18%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 46327, one of several in Hammond, Indiana, in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 6.5% nationally (29,993rd) and the bottom 2.7% of Indiana (737th).

continue reading

A few readings account for most of this area's strain: modeled uninsured resides in the top 2.9% nationally, transportation noise sits in the top 0.6% nationally, and short sleep stands in the top 2.1% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health resides in the top 3.5% nationally, vision disability sits in the top 4.3% nationally, and loud transportation noise stands in the top 1.9% nationally. Modeled tooth loss resides in the top 4.3% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 2.8% nationally. Modeled food insecurity stands in the top 3.3% nationally, and utility shutoff resides in the top 3.8% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, transportation noise runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 46394, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 44%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 33%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 2%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Disability

healthier than 10%

7%

Lifting this score

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 64%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Environmental Hazard

in the bottom 0.7%

14%

Preventive Care

in the bottom 1.0%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Disability

healthier than 3%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 9%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 5%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 4%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 2.2 years. A median household income of $47,288 predicts 77.1 years — 2.7 years below.

    Ranked #3,768 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.4%23.3–27.6
High blood pressure among adults37.6%34.9–40.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.6%5.1–6.1
Current asthma among adults11.2%10.0–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.5%6.8–8.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Depression among adults20.5%18.2–23.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.8%16.0–19.7
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.5%31.7–37.2
Obesity among adults44.8%40.8–48.9
Stroke among adults4.2%3.8–4.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years28.1%24.9–31.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years23.1%19.8–26.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure74.7%72.1–77.2
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults75.7%72.8–78.6
Cholesterol screening among adults81.0%78.7–83.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.1%52.5–59.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults44.0%41.3–46.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years71.6%66.0–76.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%14.2–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults21.5%19.0–24.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.3%34.3–42.1
Short sleep duration among adults45.9%42.5–49.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults33.9%30.6–37.2
Frequent mental distress among adults19.3%17.4–21.4
Frequent physical distress among adults18.6%16.7–20.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.3%18.1–22.7
Any disability among adults38.5%34.9–42.1
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.1–8.8
Independent living disability among adults11.8%10.5–13.3
Mobility disability among adults19.7%17.6–21.9
Self-care disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.4
Vision disability among adults10.3%9.3–11.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.5%26.4–32.9
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.6%31.8–39.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.0%20.0–26.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.3%21.6–27.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults16.0%14.1–18.0
Loneliness among adults34.5%31.2–38.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults18.0%16.0–20.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate32.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6420.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)26.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)12.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)8.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle3.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription84.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)28.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate61.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)6.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population19.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households36.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+13.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age35.3 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$47,288$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$142,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,093$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 1.1378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.13 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured