Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46201

in Indianapolis, IndianaPopulation 30,335

38.03/ 100

Ranked #27,997 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 12.7%)

Ranked #715 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (bottom 5.6%)

Ranked #110 of 115 Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN ZIPs (bottom 4.4%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

26.6%

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

546 units

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

140 intersections/sq mi

in the top 5.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

4.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

15.2%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

15.3%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

42.4%

in the top 8.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

5.2 ppb

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

US91st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

26.3%

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, ZIP 46201, one of several in Indianapolis, Indiana comes out in the bottom 12.7% nationally (27,997th) and the bottom 5.6% of Indiana (715th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides of the ledger for this area: subsidized affordable housing is in the top 4.0% nationally, walkability resides in the top 5.6% nationally, and transit rests in the top 6.3% nationally. Set against that, modeled tooth loss lies in the top 5.6% nationally, tree cover sits at the national minimum, and utility shutoff settles in the top 6.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle registers in the top 7.1% nationally, and modeled short sleep stands in the top 8.0% nationally. Lead in tap water lands in the top 9.5% nationally, and poverty is in the top 9.5% nationally.

In plain terms, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 46202, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 76%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 39%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 11%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 25%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 9%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 96%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 28%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 3%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 4%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.2 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $49,195 predicts 77.3 years — 6.1 years below.

    Ranked #5,747 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 71.2 ± 1.1 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.4 years — 6.2 years below them.

    Ranked #3,570 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%23.4–27.0
High blood pressure among adults38.7%36.4–41.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.7%5.2–6.2
Current asthma among adults12.4%11.2–13.6
Coronary heart disease among adults6.4%5.9–7.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.3%8.5–10.2
Depression among adults28.0%25.6–30.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.1%12.8–15.4
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.4%33.2–37.7
Obesity among adults41.9%38.7–45.2
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years26.6%23.4–29.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.7%13.1–16.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.1%70.7–75.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults76.7%74.3–79.0
Cholesterol screening among adults81.5%79.6–83.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.2%56.7–63.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults50.1%47.4–52.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.2%68.1–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.5%16.4–20.7
Current cigarette smoking among adults20.4%18.5–22.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.8%26.4–31.3
Short sleep duration among adults42.4%39.3–45.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.4%24.4–28.3
Frequent mental distress among adults20.5%18.8–22.3
Frequent physical distress among adults16.0%14.6–17.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.2%17.6–20.8
Any disability among adults34.6%32.1–37.1
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.6–6.9
Independent living disability among adults10.9%9.9–11.8
Mobility disability among adults16.3%14.8–17.7
Self-care disability among adults5.4%5.0–5.9
Vision disability among adults7.5%7.0–8.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.6%24.1–29.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.0%23.8–28.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.7%16.8–20.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.9%17.1–20.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.8–14.4
Loneliness among adults36.9%34.1–39.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.2%13.7–16.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.3%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–6414.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)20.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)28.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)7.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle15.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription87.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)35.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate51.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population10.2%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households44.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+11.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age34.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$49,195$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$170,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$941$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.2 yr ± 0.5878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.58 years of 71.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured