Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45410

in Dayton, OhioPopulation 14,694

40.24/ 100

Ranked #26,588 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranked #967 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #49 of 57 Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH ZIPs (bottom 14.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

470 ppb

in the top 0.01% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

210 intersections/sq mi

in the top 2.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.00%

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

374 units

in the top 6.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

24.6%

in the top 7.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.5%

in the bottom 5.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 45410, one of several in Dayton, Ohio, on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 17% nationally (26,588th) and the bottom 18% of Ohio (967th).

continue reading

The main burdens in the data show plainly and lead the picture: lead in tap water rests in the top 0.01% nationally, PFOS in drinking water sits at the national maximum, and modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 4.1% nationally. Modeled tree cover lands at the national minimum, PFAS in drinking water resides at the national maximum, and modeled tooth loss lies in the top 7.8% nationally. More positively, walkability settles in the top 2.2% nationally, and floodplain exposure stands at the national minimum. Subsidized affordable housing is in the top 6.4% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol rests in the bottom 5.5% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, lead in tap water runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 45409, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 49%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 25%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 6%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 5%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 37%

7%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 24%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 10%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 6%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 7%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 91%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 14%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 20%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 5%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.2 ± 1.7 years. A median household income of $46,651 predicts 77.1 years — 3.9 years below.

    Ranked #5,007 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.2 ± 1.7 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.2 years — 4.0 years below them.

    Ranked #3,024 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.4%23.9–29.0
High blood pressure among adults34.3%31.2–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults6.7%6.1–7.3
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.7–13.4
Coronary heart disease among adults6.7%6.1–7.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.2%8.2–10.2
Depression among adults28.9%25.7–32.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.8%12.3–15.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.5%28.4–34.7
Obesity among adults39.6%34.7–44.7
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years24.6%21.0–28.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.9%9.3–12.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure73.8%71.0–76.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.3%74.1–80.4
Cholesterol screening among adults81.3%79.1–83.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.2%56.1–64.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults52.2%49.0–55.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.6%63.7–76.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.5–20.1
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.8%17.5–22.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults32.2%28.5–36.0
Short sleep duration among adults42.0%37.8–46.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.4%21.9–27.0
Frequent mental distress among adults21.0%19.0–23.3
Frequent physical distress among adults15.5%13.9–17.3
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.7%16.0–19.6
Any disability among adults33.5%30.0–37.1
Hearing disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Independent living disability among adults10.3%9.3–11.4
Mobility disability among adults14.8%13.2–16.6
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.4–5.3
Vision disability among adults6.2%5.7–6.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%19.1–25.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults20.8%18.2–23.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.4%17.1–22.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.3%14.2–18.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.6%10.3–13.0
Loneliness among adults38.0%33.4–42.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.5%11.0–14.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate22.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–649.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)12.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle13.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription89.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate49.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population4.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households42.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+12.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age33.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$46,651$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$110,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$986$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.2 yr ± 0.8878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 73.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured