Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46112

in Brownsburg, IndianaPopulation 44,220

61.37/ 100

Ranked #3,890 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 12.2%)

Ranked #18 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 2.4%)

Ranked #15 of 115 Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN ZIPs (top 13.1%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lithium in drinking water

9.7 µg/L

in the bottom 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST27th
US5th
Definition & source ›

The average detected level of lithium — a natural trace metal with no federal drinking-water limit yet — across the public water systems serving this ZIP, in micrograms per liter.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

281 units

in the top 8.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST91st
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.4%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.2%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.7%

in the bottom 11.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

10.2%

in the bottom 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

96.6%

in the top 12.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.0%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

2.6%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Brownsburg, Indiana (ZIP 46112) lands in the top 12.2% healthiest ZIPs nationally (3,890th) and the top 2.4% of Indiana (18th).

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: lithium in drinking water is in the bottom 5.1% nationally, and subsidized affordable housing settles in the top 8.8% nationally. Modeled loneliness resides in the bottom 9.6% nationally, and transportation registers in the bottom 9.9% nationally. Modeled food insecurity rests in the bottom 11.0% nationally, modeled mobility disability stands in the bottom 9.9% nationally, and home broadband subscription lies in the top 12.0% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lands in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Set against that, modeled expected annual loss sits in the top 8.2% nationally, and arsenic is in the top 11.6% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: lithium in drinking water is a natural metal that dissolves into some groundwater and has no federal drinking-water limit yet. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 46075, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 72%

8%

Disability

healthier than 90%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 38%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 92%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 97%

8%

Disability

healthier than 97%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 61%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 77%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 80%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 80%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.6 ± 1.7 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.8 years — 2.7 years above them.

    Ranked #1,002 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.8%24.0–29.8
High blood pressure among adults34.0%30.5–37.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.4%7.6–9.2
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults5.3%4.8–5.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.8%5.1–6.4
Depression among adults22.0%18.9–25.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.3%9.0–11.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.7%33.9–41.5
Obesity among adults35.5%30.1–41.2
Stroke among adults2.7%2.4–2.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years10.3%8.5–12.3
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.8%5.0–6.8
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.3%74.4–80.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.0–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%87.1–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.0%65.8–73.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.5%67.5–73.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.8%72.4–84.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.2–20.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%10.1–13.6
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.2%15.3–21.3
Short sleep duration among adults36.6%31.8–41.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.0%13.1–17.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.1%13.3–16.9
Frequent physical distress among adults11.4%10.0–12.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.7%10.3–13.2
Any disability among adults24.6%21.4–28.0
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.1–6.5
Independent living disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.7
Mobility disability among adults10.2%8.9–11.6
Self-care disability among adults2.6%2.4–2.9
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.7%16.2–21.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.7%7.4–10.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.9–5.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–9.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.6–5.9
Loneliness among adults28.4%24.7–32.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate6.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–646.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)48.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)2.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle2.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription96.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate81.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population6.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households46.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+12.9%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age37.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$112,565$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$329,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$1,461$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.6 yr ± 0.8578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.85 years of 80.6, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured