Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45039

in Maineville, OhioPopulation 28,335

64.22/ 100

Ranked #2,336 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 7.3%)

Ranked #30 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 2.6%)

Ranked #9 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (top 5.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Distance to a Superfund site

In this ZIP

at the national minimum

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

4.5%

in the bottom 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

7.2%

in the bottom 4.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

6.9%

in the bottom 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

5.3%

in the bottom 4.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

10.2%

in the bottom 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

9.2%

in the bottom 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.5 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 8.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

12.9%

in the bottom 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Maineville, Ohio (ZIP 45039) sits in the top 7.3% healthiest ZIPs nationally (2,336th) and the top 2.6% of Ohio (30th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: modeled transportation stands in the bottom 3.8% nationally, food insecurity is in the bottom 4.3% nationally, and housing insecurity rests in the bottom 6.7% nationally. Modeled independent living disability sits in the bottom 4.2% nationally, cognitive disability registers in the bottom 5.9% nationally, and mobility disability lands in the bottom 6.2% nationally. Fatal road crashes resides in the bottom 8.5% nationally, and modeled fair or poor health lies in the bottom 5.7% nationally. On the other hand, distance to a Superfund site settles at the national minimum, and modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 6.5% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. ZIP 45040, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall. This ZIP also sits on the healthier half of the national range on at least seven of the ten good-life measures tracked here, from quiet and green space to nearby care, a combination reached by about one in twenty-five US ZIP codes.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 83%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 69%

8%

Disability

healthier than 95%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 40%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 96%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 95%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 95%

8%

Disability

healthier than 98%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 44%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 27%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 90%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 87%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 67%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 91%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 91%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 47%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults26.9%24.0–29.9
High blood pressure among adults31.3%27.8–34.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.5–10.1
Current asthma among adults10.0%8.8–11.2
Coronary heart disease among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Depression among adults23.1%19.9–26.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.2%8.8–11.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.1%31.3–39.0
Obesity among adults32.3%26.7–38.2
Stroke among adults2.6%2.3–2.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.1%4.9–7.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.0%4.2–6.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.5%76.5–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%77.0–83.0
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.8–90.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.3%66.2–74.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults73.4%70.5–76.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.9%73.6–85.4
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.1%15.1–21.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.0%9.3–12.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults18.1%15.0–21.3
Short sleep duration among adults33.8%28.6–39.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults12.9%11.0–14.8
Frequent mental distress among adults14.7%12.9–16.5
Frequent physical distress among adults10.8%9.4–12.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%8.9–11.6
Any disability among adults21.5%18.4–24.7
Hearing disability among adults5.4%4.8–6.0
Independent living disability among adults5.3%4.7–6.0
Mobility disability among adults9.2%7.9–10.6
Self-care disability among adults2.3%2.1–2.6
Vision disability among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.8%14.7–21.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.2%5.8–8.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.0%4.0–6.1
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.6–8.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.5%3.9–5.2
Loneliness among adults28.6%23.6–33.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.1–5.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate4.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–646.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)51.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)1.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle1.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription95.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)20.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate83.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population9.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households45.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+17.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age39.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$108,794$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$327,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,677$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 0.6578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.65 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured