Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

46071

in Thorntown, IndianaPopulation 3,072

55.62/ 100

Ranked #8,722 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 27%)

Ranked #65 of 757 Indiana ZIPs (top 8.6%)

Ranked #34 of 115 Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

43.6%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 5.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Loneliness

28.4%

in the bottom 9.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST2nd
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Civic-institution access

0.59 per 1,000 residents

in the top 9.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US90th
Definition & source ›

The number of civic and social organizations inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.9 pCi/L

in the top 12.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.6%

in the bottom 15% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

8.1%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

32.2%

in the bottom 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST4th
US22nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Uninsured (under 65)

6.2%

in the bottom 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US17th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 18–64 with no current health-insurance coverage.

Full methodology ›

The read

Thorntown, Indiana (ZIP 46071), by its composite score, sits in the top 27% healthiest ZIPs nationally (8,722nd) and the top 8.6% of Indiana (65th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: childcare lies in the top 7.4% nationally, and modeled loneliness rests in the bottom 9.6% nationally. Civic resides in the top 9.9% nationally, and modeled transportation is in the bottom 15% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity lands in the bottom 17% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled arsenic stands in the top 1.2% nationally, industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 5.9% nationally, and radon settles in the top 12.7% nationally. Fatal road crashes sits in the top 11.2% nationally. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lies at the national minimum, shared with about 31% of ZIPs.

For anyone unfamiliar, arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 47930, about 2.3 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Indianapolis-Carmel-Greenwood, IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 48%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 57%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 27%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 73%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 95%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 93%

8%

Disability

healthier than 83%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 48%

14%

Disability

healthier than 55%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 46%

5%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.7%26.9–33.4
High blood pressure among adults38.2%34.8–42.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%9.0–10.9
Current asthma among adults11.1%9.9–12.5
Coronary heart disease among adults7.0%6.2–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.0%6.9–9.2
Depression among adults22.8%19.9–26.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.8%11.2–14.8
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened40.2%36.7–44.7
Obesity among adults35.4%30.0–43.1
Stroke among adults3.4%3.0–3.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.0%9.7–14.4
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.2%5.1–7.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%77.2–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.5%78.8–84.7
Cholesterol screening among adults88.7%87.2–90.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.7%65.9–75.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults67.4%63.9–70.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.6%67.8–82.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.7%13.4–19.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.7%12.3–17.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults22.1%18.7–26.5
Short sleep duration among adults32.2%26.6–37.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.2%15.7–21.0
Frequent mental distress among adults16.2%14.4–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.1–15.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.3%11.7–15.2
Any disability among adults29.3%25.7–33.6
Hearing disability among adults7.3%6.5–8.3
Independent living disability among adults7.1%6.2–8.1
Mobility disability among adults13.8%11.9–16.0
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.9–3.8
Vision disability among adults4.0%3.6–4.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.9%17.8–24.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.1%8.3–12.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.4–6.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.1%6.8–9.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.6%4.8–6.5
Loneliness among adults28.4%24.2–32.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.8% (3.3–23.6%) n=764
Uninsured 18–648.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (2.5–19.0%) n=761
No HS diploma (25+)8.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5058.8% (3.0–19.3%) n=766
Bachelor's or higher (25+)29.5%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.4% (8.1–38.5%) n=766
Unemployment rate (16+)3.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–8.2%) n=760
Households without a vehicle2.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.5%) n=764
Broadband subscription86.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.8% (76.7–95.9%) n=764
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32220.0% (9.8–33.1%) n=764
Homeownership rate85.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32281.7% (58.9–94.5%) n=764
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.1% (0.0–4.2%) n=764
Foreign-born population1.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.3% (0.0–8.8%) n=767
Single-parent households55.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (40.5–69.1%) n=756
Population 65+19.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55318.2% (11.0–26.5%) n=767
Median age43.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29240.5 yr (32.5–49.6) n=756
Median household income$85,000$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$71,016 ($50,417–$99,531) n=721
Median home value$240,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$178,250 ($109,430–$287,310) n=724
Median gross rent$896$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$925 ($704–$1,261) n=640
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)IN median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.0 yr ± 1.2578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30878.5 yr (75.1–81.5) n=754

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.25 years of 80.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured