Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

22611

in Berryville, VirginiaPopulation 9,276

57.18/ 100

Ranked #7,099 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #208 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 24%)

Ranked #226 of 308 Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Grocery access

0.22 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of full supermarkets inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one. ZipVitals’s food-access signal is derived from these in-ZIP densities — it is not USDA’s food-desert designation, which measures distance to the nearest supermarket. Where a leg is missing, a ZIP reads “not determinable,” never “not a food desert.”

Full methodology ›

Nitrate in drinking water

0.92%

in the top 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of this area’s domestic-well groundwater at or above the federal nitrate limit of 10 milligrams per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.44 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$120,381

in the top 9.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.11 per 1,000 residents

in the top 14.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

2.6 pCi/L

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US82nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Berryville, Virginia (ZIP 22611) lands in the top 22% healthiest ZIPs nationally (7,099th) and the top 24% of Virginia (208th).

continue reading

The measures that set this area apart are worth putting up front: grocery registers in the top 6.2% nationally, and pharmacy rests in the top 6.8% nationally. Household income stands in the top 9.5% nationally, and modeled colon screening lies in the top 10.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home lands at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Elder services sits in the top 14.1% nationally, modeled arsenic is in the bottom 14.8% nationally, and modeled housing insecurity settles in the bottom 16% nationally. Set against that, modeled nitrate resides in the top 6.6% nationally. Fiber broadband registers at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs.

Set beside the nearby areas, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: nitrate is a groundwater compound from fertilizer, manure, and sewage, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 20135, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 89%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 78%

11%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 67%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Mental Health

healthier than 58%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 33%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 67%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 74%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 65%

8%

Disability

healthier than 72%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 81%

5%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 13%

14%

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 52%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 42%

11%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 16%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 18%

8%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 29%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.9 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $120,381 predicts 80.8 years — 1.9 years below.

    Ranked #2,489 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.8%27.3–33.9
High blood pressure among adults37.1%32.9–40.9
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.3%9.2–11.3
Current asthma among adults10.4%9.2–11.6
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.1%6.1–8.2
Depression among adults23.8%20.2–27.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.3%10.6–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%36.7–45.4
Obesity among adults32.8%25.3–39.6
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years13.6%11.0–16.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%5.6–8.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%76.7–82.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.5%76.9–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults89.3%87.6–90.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.1%67.2–76.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.2%66.9–73.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.6%71.5–84.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.3%11.6–16.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.2%10.3–14.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.4%19.4–27.5
Short sleep duration among adults35.1%28.5–42.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults17.5%15.0–20.1
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.6–17.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.7%12.0–15.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.4%11.7–15.2
Any disability among adults31.5%27.2–35.7
Hearing disability among adults7.7%6.8–8.6
Independent living disability among adults7.5%6.6–8.6
Mobility disability among adults14.8%12.7–16.9
Self-care disability among adults3.4%3.0–3.9
Vision disability among adults4.3%3.8–4.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.6%16.3–23.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.7%7.9–11.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.6%6.0–9.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.6–9.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.7%4.9–6.7
Loneliness among adults31.5%26.5–37.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.2%4.4–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–648.8%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)7.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)37.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle3.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription88.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate76.7%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.7%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population5.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households58.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+20.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age46.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$120,381$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$580,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$1,425$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.9 yr ± 0.7278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.72 years of 78.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured