Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45616

in Blue Creek, OhioPopulation 1,350

36.29/ 100

Ranked #28,857 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 10.1%)

Ranked #1,064 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 9.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tree cover

85.2%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

33.6%

in the top 5.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.05%

in the bottom 7.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.3%

in the top 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

10.3%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST97th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

2.3 intersections/sq mi

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US9th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

17.6%

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

0.84 per 1,000 residents

in the top 12.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.0%

in the top 12.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US88th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.1%

in the top 12.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

The read

On the composite measure, Blue Creek, Ohio (ZIP 45616) stands in the bottom 10.1% nationally (28,857th) and the bottom 9.6% of Ohio (1,064th).

continue reading

A balanced set of signals defines this area, not any single one: modeled tree cover lies in the top 3.0% nationally, and transportation noise is in the bottom 7.3% nationally. Households without a vehicle registers at the national minimum, shared with about 16% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise lies at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Recreation is in the top 12.5% nationally. By contrast, poverty registers in the top 5.0% nationally, modeled energy burden lies in the top 6.3% nationally, and modeled coronary heart disease is in the top 7.7% nationally. Walkability registers in the bottom 9.1% nationally, and modeled diabetes lies in the top 9.4% nationally.

For clarity, transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. Energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. ZIP 45657, just across the boundary, ranks better overall among the ZIPs nearby.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 58%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 7%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 7%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 88%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Disability

healthier than 7%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 23%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 58.0; chronic-disease standing 7.1 (bottom 10%) — 51 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,427 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.6%33.6–39.9
High blood pressure among adults44.3%40.6–48.0
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.2%9.3–11.4
Current asthma among adults12.0%10.9–13.5
Coronary heart disease among adults10.3%9.2–11.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.5%11.5–15.7
Depression among adults27.0%23.9–30.6
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.6%15.6–19.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.4%37.8–45.2
Obesity among adults42.4%36.6–48.6
Stroke among adults5.1%4.5–5.9
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.3%17.3–23.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.4%7.1–12.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.3%80.2–84.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.7%78.0–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%82.7–87.0
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.4%55.8–64.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults54.1%50.8–57.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.4%66.2–78.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.7%11.6–16.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.0%19.0–27.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults36.9%31.9–42.5
Short sleep duration among adults39.7%34.3–45.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.0%23.4–31.5
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.5–22.1
Frequent physical distress among adults18.8%16.6–21.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.0–20.2
Any disability among adults37.2%32.6–42.2
Hearing disability among adults9.5%8.5–10.7
Independent living disability among adults11.5%9.9–13.4
Mobility disability among adults20.5%17.7–23.6
Self-care disability among adults6.0%5.2–7.1
Vision disability among adults7.1%6.2–8.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.3–25.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.4%15.5–23.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults19.1%15.3–23.3
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%10.8–16.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.9%8.3–11.7
Loneliness among adults33.4%29.0–38.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.7%9.0–12.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate33.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6411.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)16.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)35.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)1.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription77.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate73.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households68.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+27.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age54.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$67,614$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$182,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$686$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.7 yr ± 1.0978.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.09 years of 73.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured