Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Menu

ZIP code

45775

in Rutland, OhioPopulation 1,650

ZipVitals Score
How is the ZipVitals Score calculated? →

34.59/ 100

Ranked #29,531 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 8.0%)

Ranked #1,097 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 6.8%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Coronary heart disease

11.2%

in the top 3.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

77.1%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

44.9%

in the top 4.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.2%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

46.8%

in the top 8.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.3%

in the top 10.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

28.1%

in the top 12.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

10.6 mi

in the top 13.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US87th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

20.8%

in the top 13.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

5.9%

in the top 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Rutland, Ohio (ZIP 45775) ranks in the bottom 8.0% nationally (29,531st) and the bottom 6.8% of Ohio (1,097th).

continue reading

A profile of give and take, with clear readings each way: modeled tree cover lies in the top 6.1% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 13.1% nationally. On the other side, modeled coronary heart disease registers in the top 3.6% nationally, and obesity lies in the top 4.6% nationally. Modeled diabetes is in the top 7.5% nationally, and high blood pressure registers in the top 8.1% nationally. Fiber broadband lies at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Modeled industrial-pollution burden is in the top 10.5% nationally, stroke registers in the top 10.1% nationally, and fair or poor health lies in the top 12.6% nationally.

For context, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 45769, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 60%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 56%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 15%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 36%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 86%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 18%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Disability

healthier than 6%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 28%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 25%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 56.1; chronic-disease standing 5.1 (bottom 10%) — 51 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,415 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.6%34.0–41.1
High blood pressure among adults46.8%42.8–50.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.4%9.4–11.5
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.2–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults11.2%10.1–12.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.5%12.0–15.3
Depression among adults27.0%23.4–30.7
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.2%16.1–20.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.0%37.9–46.2
Obesity among adults44.9%38.1–51.6
Stroke among adults5.3%4.8–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years20.9%17.6–24.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.9%8.0–12.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.6%79.0–83.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.0%76.7–83.1
Cholesterol screening among adults85.0%83.0–86.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.8%58.6–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults53.9%50.2–57.5
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years70.0%61.9–77.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.2%12.6–18.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults23.2%20.1–26.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults39.6%34.7–44.8
Short sleep duration among adults40.2%34.2–46.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.1%24.7–31.8
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%17.8–22.2
Frequent physical distress among adults19.1%17.0–21.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.6%15.6–19.9
Any disability among adults38.3%34.0–42.9
Hearing disability among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Independent living disability among adults11.3%10.0–12.7
Mobility disability among adults20.8%18.4–23.6
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.3–6.7
Vision disability among adults7.1%6.3–7.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.2%18.7–26.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults18.9%15.8–22.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults18.2%15.4–21.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.2%11.2–15.4
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.7%8.4–11.1
Loneliness among adults34.1%28.9–39.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.5%9.0–12.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate10.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–648.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)9.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)3.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle5.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription79.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate82.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households41.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+22.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age33.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$47,036$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$116,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent—$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.1 yr ± 1.2678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.26 years of 76.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured