Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24845

in Ikes Fork, West VirginiaPopulation 322

23.62/ 100

Ranked #31,601 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 1.5%)

Ranked #623 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 10.7%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

36.6%

in the top 0.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

93.2%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

54%

in the top 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

49%

in the top 0.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

26.6%

in the top 1.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

12.2%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

21.1%

in the top 2.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34.7%

in the top 2.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

50.7%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST5th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

6.2%

in the top 2.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, Ikes Fork, West Virginia (ZIP 24845) ranks in the bottom 1.5% nationally (31,601st) and the bottom 10.7% of West Virginia (623rd).

continue reading

Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: modeled tooth loss lies in the top 0.9% nationally, and high blood pressure lands in the top 1.1% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol sits in the top 0.6% nationally, and mobility disability is in the top 1.9% nationally. Modeled coronary heart disease settles in the top 1.5% nationally, diabetes resides in the top 2.4% nationally, and fair or poor health registers in the top 2.9% nationally. Home broadband subscription rests in the bottom 1.6% nationally, and modeled energy burden stands in the top 2.3% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled tree cover lies in the top 0.6% nationally.

To spell things out, energy burden is the share of household income that goes to home energy bills. Close by, ZIP 24839, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 79%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

in the bottom 0.3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 31%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 1%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 3%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 66%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 62%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 6%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 6%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 21%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 12%

11%

Disability

healthier than 16%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.2%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults46.5%42.3–50.8
High blood pressure among adults54.0%49.3–58.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.7–12.1
Current asthma among adults12.8%11.2–14.6
Coronary heart disease among adults12.2%10.6–14.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults16.1%13.4–19.0
Depression among adults30.9%26.7–35.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults21.1%18.2–24.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened49.0%44.3–53.9
Obesity among adults46.6%38.6–55.2
Stroke among adults5.8%5.0–6.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years36.6%31.3–42.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.8%8.0–14.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.0%79.3–84.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%78.4–84.8
Cholesterol screening among adults87.3%85.0–89.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.4%57.6–69.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults44.1%40.2–48.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years69.7%60.9–77.6
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults12.3%10.0–15.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults27.6%22.6–32.7
No leisure-time physical activity among adults42.2%35.4–49.3
Short sleep duration among adults44.2%37.2–51.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.7%29.3–40.6
Frequent mental distress among adults21.7%19.2–24.6
Frequent physical distress among adults22.5%19.3–26.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.5%18.2–25.2
Any disability among adults48.6%42.5–55.0
Hearing disability among adults11.8%10.2–13.5
Independent living disability among adults14.0%11.7–16.5
Mobility disability among adults26.6%22.5–31.0
Self-care disability among adults6.8%5.6–8.1
Vision disability among adults8.0%6.7–9.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.9%20.7–29.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.6%17.2–26.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults25.4%20.5–30.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.9%12.2–17.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.7%8.9–12.7
Loneliness among adults35.2%29.7–40.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults13.7%11.5–15.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate41.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–647.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)5.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)13.7%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle10.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription50.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate90.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households58.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+17.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age39.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth71.3 yr ± 2.3378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.33 years of 71.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured