Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45251

in Cincinnati, OhioPopulation 20,254

49.44/ 100

Ranked #17,018 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 47%)

Ranked #462 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 39%)

Ranked #76 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.7%

in the top 9.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

89.2%

in the top 16% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US84th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 17% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US83rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite health measure, ZIP 45251, one of several in Cincinnati, Ohio ranks in the bottom 47% nationally (17,018th) and the top 39% of Ohio (462nd).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: floodplain exposure is in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Park land resides in the top 14.0% nationally, and transit registers in the top 16% nationally. Set against that, PFOS in drinking water rests at the national maximum, PFAS in drinking water stands at the national maximum, and modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 5.7% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise lands in the top 9.8% nationally, households without a vehicle sits in the top 13.0% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site is in the bottom 15% nationally.

Read against the ZIPs closest to it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To spell things out, PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Close by, ZIP 45014, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 71%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 45%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 48%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 41%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 60%

13%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Risk Behavior

healthier than 27%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 22%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 69%

14%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 69%

5%

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 54%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 57%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 52%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 68%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 44%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 44%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 45%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 41%

8%

Disability

healthier than 40%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 34%

16%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 76.2 ± 1.2 years. A median household income of $74,614 predicts 78.9 years — 2.7 years below.

    Ranked #3,768 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults29.7%27.2–32.3
High blood pressure among adults38.0%35.1–41.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.1%7.4–8.9
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.6–13.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.5–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%7.4–9.0
Depression among adults25.9%23.0–28.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.2%12.6–15.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.7%32.7–38.8
Obesity among adults36.6%32.5–40.9
Stroke among adults3.8%3.5–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.6%14.0–19.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.6%7.4–9.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.8%77.4–82.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.8%77.2–82.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.0%84.4–87.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years66.6%62.7–70.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.3%57.3–63.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.1%71.4–82.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.3%14.1–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.3%14.3–18.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.3%24.1–30.6
Short sleep duration among adults39.7%35.8–43.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.5%18.3–22.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.3%16.5–20.3
Frequent physical distress among adults13.6%12.1–15.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.3%12.8–15.9
Any disability among adults29.4%26.4–32.5
Hearing disability among adults6.6%5.9–7.3
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.8–9.6
Mobility disability among adults14.3%12.6–15.9
Self-care disability among adults4.1%3.8–4.5
Vision disability among adults5.2%4.8–5.7
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.3%20.1–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.7%14.5–18.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults14.3%12.5–16.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults13.8%12.0–15.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Loneliness among adults34.4%30.1–38.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.8–11.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate9.5%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6412.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)8.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)22.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)3.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle10.9%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription89.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)31.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate77.9%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.6%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population4.7%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households47.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+16.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age39.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$74,614$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$185,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,307$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.2 yr ± 0.6078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.60 years of 76.2, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured