Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45247

in Cincinnati, OhioPopulation 23,617

58.62/ 100

Ranked #5,881 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranked #96 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 8.2%)

Ranked #24 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (top 15%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOS in drinking water

99%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Lack of transportation

5.1%

in the bottom 8.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who lacked reliable transportation in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Food insecurity

8.4%

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced food insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Housing insecurity

7.5%

in the bottom 11.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who experienced housing insecurity in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

11.0%

in the bottom 10.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.4%

in the bottom 13.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST10th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

71.4%

in the top 13.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

15.2%

in the bottom 14.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

79.4%

in the top 14.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US85th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 45247, one of several in Cincinnati, Ohio ranks in the top 18% healthiest ZIPs nationally (5,881st) and the top 8.2% of Ohio (96th).

continue reading

Several of the strongest readings define how this area looks: modeled transportation registers in the bottom 8.7% nationally, and food insecurity lies in the bottom 9.2% nationally. Modeled housing insecurity is in the bottom 11.4% nationally, and distance to an emergency room registers in the bottom 12.0% nationally. Modeled cognitive disability lies in the bottom 10.2% nationally. Distance to a nursing home is at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. On the other hand, PFOS in drinking water registers in the top 4.5% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 6.2% nationally, and PFAS in drinking water is in the top 11.1% nationally. Distance to a Superfund site registers in the bottom 12.8% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 45252, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 58%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 48%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 91%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 94%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 87%

8%

Disability

healthier than 89%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 62%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 74%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 91%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 85%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 77%

8%

Disability

healthier than 76%

7%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 44%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 80.1 ± 1.2 years. The 45 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 75.7 years — 4.4 years above them.

    Ranked #242 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.8%28.2–33.5
High blood pressure among adults36.2%33.1–39.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.6%9.7–11.6
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.6–11.9
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.4–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.9%6.1–7.6
Depression among adults25.3%22.5–28.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.1%10.7–13.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%34.5–40.6
Obesity among adults31.6%27.8–35.6
Stroke among adults3.3%3.0–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.5%9.6–13.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.5%4.7–6.4
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure81.7%79.2–83.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%78.5–83.5
Cholesterol screening among adults89.1%87.8–90.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.4%67.8–74.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.7%66.0–71.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.4%74.2–84.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.4%15.0–20.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.8%10.3–13.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.0%18.3–23.7
Short sleep duration among adults34.2%30.7–37.9
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.2%13.5–17.0
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.7–17.0
Frequent physical distress among adults11.7%10.4–13.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.0%9.8–12.3
Any disability among adults25.0%22.3–27.9
Hearing disability among adults6.9%6.2–7.7
Independent living disability among adults6.4%5.7–7.1
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.3–13.1
Self-care disability among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
Vision disability among adults3.6%3.3–3.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults18.5%15.9–21.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.1–9.8
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.4%5.4–7.5
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.5%6.4–8.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
Loneliness among adults30.4%26.5–34.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.4%4.6–6.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate5.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–643.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)3.5%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)39.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)3.1%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle5.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription94.6%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)23.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate79.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population3.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households55.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+23.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age45.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$94,603$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$288,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,107$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth80.1 yr ± 0.6178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.61 years of 80.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured