Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45209

in Cincinnati, OhioPopulation 10,570

65.34/ 100

Ranked #1,869 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 5.9%)

Ranked #19 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 1.7%)

Ranked #8 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (top 5.2%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Binge drinking

23.5%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

26.1%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

22.3%

in the bottom 1.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Recreation access

2.1 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of places for physical recreation — gyms, sports, and fitness venues — inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

5.6%

in the bottom 1.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

1.6%

in the bottom 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Coronary heart disease

3.2%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.

Full methodology ›

Hearing disability

3.6%

in the bottom 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

7.5 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

6.3%

in the bottom 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, ZIP 45209, one of several in Cincinnati, Ohio places in the top 5.9% healthiest ZIPs nationally (1,869th) and the top 1.7% of Ohio (19th).

continue reading

The measures fall on both sides for this area, fairly evenly: modeled high cholesterol lands in the bottom 1.5% nationally, and high blood pressure stands in the bottom 1.8% nationally. Recreation registers in the top 1.3% nationally, and modeled mobility disability settles in the bottom 1.1% nationally. Modeled stroke sits in the bottom 1.4% nationally, coronary heart disease lies in the bottom 1.7% nationally, and hearing disability rests in the bottom 1.5% nationally. Transit resides in the top 2.3% nationally, and modeled diabetes is in the bottom 1.7% nationally. Pulling the other way, modeled binge drinking lands in the top 1.0% nationally.

Beside the areas that surround it, park land runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Among nearby ZIPs, the nearest healthier one overall is ZIP 45208, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 98%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 95%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 68%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 72%

11%

Disability

in the top 0.5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 69%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 82%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 3%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 35%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.4%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 97%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 70%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 92%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 74%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.00%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 80%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 45%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 4%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

in the top 0.00%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 86%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 61%

8%

Disability

in the top 0.00%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 71%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 65%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.9 ± 1.9 years. A median household income of $93,420 predicts 79.8 years — 5.0 years below.

    Ranked #5,531 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Heavy environment, light chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 3.1 (bottom 10%); chronic-disease standing 98.2 (top 10%) — 95 points apart, heavier on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #18,115 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults16.8%15.2–18.6
High blood pressure among adults22.3%20.1–24.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.6%5.1–6.1
Current asthma among adults10.2%9.1–11.4
Coronary heart disease among adults3.2%2.9–3.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults3.2%2.8–3.7
Depression among adults26.7%23.9–29.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults6.3%5.6–7.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened26.1%23.7–28.7
Obesity among adults27.8%24.3–31.6
Stroke among adults1.6%1.5–1.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years6.6%5.4–7.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.2%4.1–6.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure69.0%66.4–71.4
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults74.9%71.6–78.0
Cholesterol screening among adults84.7%82.4–86.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years72.9%69.7–76.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults72.1%69.5–74.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years81.9%77.2–86.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults23.5%20.4–26.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults7.6%6.2–9.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults14.1%12.1–16.3
Short sleep duration among adults33.0%29.4–36.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults9.9%8.5–11.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.1–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults7.5%6.6–8.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults10.2%8.8–11.7
Any disability among adults17.7%15.4–20.1
Hearing disability among adults3.6%3.2–4.0
Independent living disability among adults4.6%4.0–5.3
Mobility disability among adults5.6%4.9–6.4
Self-care disability among adults1.6%1.4–1.8
Vision disability among adults2.3%2.1–2.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.4%14.8–20.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.5–8.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults4.7%3.7–6.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults6.8%5.6–8.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults4.8%4.1–5.7
Loneliness among adults32.4%28.3–36.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults4.7%4.0–5.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.7%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–646.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)3.9%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)74.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)2.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle6.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription94.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)21.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate39.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population5.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households51.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+9.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age32.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$93,420$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$400,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,309$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.9 yr ± 0.9578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.95 years of 74.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured