Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45223

in Cincinnati, OhioPopulation 14,182

45.66/ 100

Ranked #21,701 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranked #694 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 41%)

Ranked #106 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Transit access

9.8 per 1,000 residents

in the top 1.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Subsidized affordable housing

711 units

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST97th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of affordable rental units in this ZIP supported by the federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit program.

Full methodology ›

Park land

40.8%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

15.9%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 5.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

16.2%

in the top 6.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US94th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

31.2%

in the bottom 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST3rd
US5th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

92.9%

in the top 7.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST89th
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

48.6%

in the bottom 8.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST7th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Loud transportation noise

1.9%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 65 decibels — around the volume of normal conversation.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 45223, one of several in Cincinnati, Ohio sits in the bottom 32% nationally (21,701st) and the bottom 41% of Ohio (694th).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: transit sits in the top 1.4% nationally, subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 2.7% nationally, and park land lands in the top 3.2% nationally. Modeled high cholesterol resides in the bottom 4.9% nationally. Working the other way, modeled utility shutoff lies in the top 5.7% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden settles in the top 5.8% nationally. Households without a vehicle stands in the top 6.4% nationally, and PFOS in drinking water is in the top 7.7% nationally. Homeownership rests in the bottom 8.4% nationally, and modeled loud transportation noise sits in the top 8.4% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Subsidized affordable housing is the main federal tax-credit program (HUD) funding affordable rental housing, counted as local units it supports. ZIP 45220, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 75%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 88%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 36%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 9%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 14%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 66%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 37%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 17%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 22%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 28%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 20%

8%

Disability

healthier than 35%

7%

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 93%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 55%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 25%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 13%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Disability

healthier than 26%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults25.1%22.9–27.4
High blood pressure among adults36.1%33.2–38.8
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults5.6%5.1–6.2
Current asthma among adults12.5%11.2–13.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.0%5.5–6.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.7%6.9–8.6
Depression among adults26.8%23.9–29.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.1%12.6–15.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened31.2%28.4–34.0
Obesity among adults40.3%36.1–44.6
Stroke among adults3.7%3.4–4.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years21.3%18.8–24.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.6%8.0–11.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.7%73.2–78.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.6%75.8–81.4
Cholesterol screening among adults83.4%81.3–85.3
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.1%59.2–66.9
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults57.8%54.8–60.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.1%72.7–82.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.8–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.4%15.2–19.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.7%24.4–31.0
Short sleep duration among adults41.5%37.6–45.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults22.4%19.9–24.9
Frequent mental distress among adults19.9%17.9–22.0
Frequent physical distress among adults13.2%11.7–14.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.9%14.1–17.8
Any disability among adults29.1%26.0–32.2
Hearing disability among adults5.1%4.5–5.7
Independent living disability among adults10.1%9.0–11.4
Mobility disability among adults13.8%12.3–15.4
Self-care disability among adults5.2%4.7–5.7
Vision disability among adults6.7%6.1–7.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.4%20.2–26.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.8%20.9–26.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.9%21.2–26.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.2%16.8–21.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.1%11.6–14.6
Loneliness among adults35.1%30.8–39.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults15.9%14.1–17.7
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6414.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)8.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)45.6%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)8.6%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle16.2%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription87.1%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)39.8%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate48.6%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population5.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households40.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+9.2%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age35.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$49,312$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$210,100$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$948$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy unavailable for this ZIP — fewer than 80% of the census tracts that make it up could be matched across the 2010→2020 tract-boundary revision, so no value is published rather than an unreliable one. See how coverage gaps are handled.
More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured