Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45420

in Kettering, OhioPopulation 24,411

47.47/ 100

Ranked #19,579 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 39%)

Ranked #578 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 49%)

Ranked #41 of 57 Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH ZIPs (bottom 28%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Lead in tap water

260 ppb

in the top 0.05% nationally

Lower is healthier

US99th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.1 mi

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

110 intersections/sq mi

in the top 8.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

32.9%

in the bottom 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST5th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.62%

in the bottom 21% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US21st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 45420, one of several in Kettering, Ohio, in overall standing, comes out in the bottom 39% nationally (19,579th) and the top 49% of Ohio (578th).

continue reading

A demanding profile, and several measures drive it: lead in tap water stands in the top 0.05% nationally, PFOS in drinking water resides at the national maximum, and PFAS in drinking water sits at the national maximum. Modeled industrial-pollution burden stands in the top 6.7% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site resides in the bottom 7.6% nationally. On the stronger side, walkability sits in the top 8.7% nationally, and modeled high cholesterol stands in the bottom 9.1% nationally. Mental-health providers resides in the top 13.3% nationally. Distance to a nursing home sits at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Fatal road crashes stands in the bottom 13.5% nationally.

Set within its surrounding area, lead in tap water runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Defined simply, for reference, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. The closest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 45409, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 57%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 53%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 41%

13%

Disability

healthier than 57%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 22%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 77%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 60%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 72%

5%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Disability

healthier than 52%

7%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 21%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 28%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 19%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 30%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 63%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 64%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 41%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 39%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 23%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 23%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 14%

8%

Disability

healthier than 32%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.0 years. A median household income of $60,588 predicts 78.1 years — 3.7 years below.

    Ranked #4,893 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Below its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 74.4 ± 1.0 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.1 years — 2.7 years below them.

    Ranked #2,131 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.1%25.5–30.7
High blood pressure among adults34.3%31.2–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.6–9.1
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.3–12.9
Coronary heart disease among adults6.9%6.2–7.6
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.5%7.6–9.4
Depression among adults28.1%24.9–31.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.0%11.5–14.6
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened32.9%29.8–36.2
Obesity among adults36.4%31.7–41.4
Stroke among adults3.5%3.2–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years15.7%13.1–18.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years8.3%7.1–9.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure76.4%73.8–78.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults78.8%75.7–81.5
Cholesterol screening among adults84.2%82.5–85.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years65.5%61.5–69.4
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.6%57.4–63.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.3%68.0–80.0
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.1%14.5–19.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults16.7%14.6–18.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.7%25.3–32.4
Short sleep duration among adults38.5%34.5–42.7
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults20.8%18.6–23.3
Frequent mental distress among adults19.1%17.2–21.1
Frequent physical distress among adults14.3%12.8–16.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.2%13.7–16.9
Any disability among adults31.1%27.8–34.6
Hearing disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.4
Independent living disability among adults8.7%7.9–9.7
Mobility disability among adults13.9%12.3–15.6
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.6–4.3
Vision disability among adults4.9%4.5–5.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.4%17.5–23.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.6%12.6–16.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.7%11.1–14.6
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults11.9%10.4–13.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.5%7.5–9.6
Loneliness among adults36.4%31.9–41.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.8–10.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate13.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–649.6%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)7.7%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)27.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)4.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle7.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription88.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate62.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.9%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population6.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households48.1%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+15.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age36.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$60,588$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$131,300$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$985$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.4 yr ± 0.5278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.52 years of 74.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured