Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43613

in Toledo, OhioPopulation 30,780

46.51/ 100

Ranked #20,751 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 35%)

Ranked #642 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 45%)

Ranked #46 of 61 Toledo, OH ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Fiber broadband

99.9%

in the top 2.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 5.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

110 intersections/sq mi

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST89th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

0.11%

in the bottom 14.9% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the top 18% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US82nd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

High cholesterol

34.2%

in the bottom 14.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US15th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.

Full methodology ›

Radon

1.1 pCi/L

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US27th
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

The read

ZIP 43613, one of several in Toledo, Ohio, on the composite measure, lands in the bottom 35% nationally (20,751st) and the bottom 45% of Ohio (642nd).

continue reading

The readings split fairly evenly between strengths and concerns: fiber broadband lies in the top 2.1% nationally, lead in tap water settles at the national minimum, and walkability stands in the top 8.6% nationally. Transit is in the top 11.1% nationally. Distance to a community health center rests at the national minimum, shared with about 23% of ZIPs. Working the other way, PFAS in drinking water sits at the national maximum, and modeled industrial-pollution burden registers in the top 5.6% nationally. Modeled loneliness lands in the top 10.1% nationally, and short sleep resides in the top 14.0% nationally. Modeled tree cover lies in the bottom 14.9% nationally.

Set against the neighboring ZIPs, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In everyday language, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. A healthier neighbor overall sits at ZIP 43606, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Toledo, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 73%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 90%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Preventive Care

healthier than 42%

13%

Disability

healthier than 51%

7%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 19%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 10%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 76%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 89%

5%

About typical

Disability

healthier than 44%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 29%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 35%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 30%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 17%

8%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 68%

21%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 92%

5%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 17%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 26%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 11%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 11%

8%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults28.9%26.5–31.4
High blood pressure among adults34.5%31.6–37.4
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%7.0–8.3
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.3–12.8
Coronary heart disease among adults6.8%6.1–7.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.6%7.8–9.4
Depression among adults28.0%25.0–31.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.7%11.3–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.2%31.3–37.3
Obesity among adults36.1%31.8–40.6
Stroke among adults3.6%3.3–3.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years16.1%14.3–18.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.0%7.8–10.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.5%75.0–79.9
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.3%76.5–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults84.6%82.9–86.2
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.5%61.0–66.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.7%58.5–62.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.4%71.6–79.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.9%14.4–19.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.6%15.7–19.8
No leisure-time physical activity among adults29.0%25.9–32.3
Short sleep duration among adults40.7%38.1–43.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults21.3%19.2–23.5
Frequent mental distress among adults19.6%17.7–21.6
Frequent physical distress among adults14.6%13.2–16.2
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults15.7%14.1–17.3
Any disability among adults30.9%27.9–34.0
Hearing disability among adults6.3%5.7–7.0
Independent living disability among adults9.2%8.3–10.1
Mobility disability among adults14.2%12.7–15.8
Self-care disability among adults4.3%4.0–4.7
Vision disability among adults5.4%4.9–5.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.7%19.7–26.2
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.1%14.9–19.5
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.2%13.4–17.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults14.1%12.3–16.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults9.5%8.4–10.6
Loneliness among adults37.6%33.1–42.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.6%9.4–12.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.6%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–646.5%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)8.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)5.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle8.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription89.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)24.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate67.5%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population2.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households46.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+15.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age34.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$64,384$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$136,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$946$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.5 yr ± 0.5678.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.56 years of 77.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured