Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45152

in Morrow, OhioPopulation 14,850

58.07/ 100

Ranked #6,335 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #109 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 9.3%)

Ranked #30 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Median household income

$123,366

in the top 8.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST76th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.9 mi

in the bottom 10.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST8th
US10th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

10.5%

in the bottom 11.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US11th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

2.0%

in the bottom 12.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US13th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

6.3%

in the bottom 12.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

3.4%

in the bottom 8.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

2.8%

in the bottom 12.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US12th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

18.6%

in the top 14.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST90th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

15.1%

in the bottom 14.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST9th
US14th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Morrow, Ohio (ZIP 45152) ranks in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,335th) and the top 9.3% of Ohio (109th).

continue reading

The bright spots in the data define much of the story here: household income settles in the top 8.6% nationally. Modeled loud transportation noise rests at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs. Modeled mobility disability lands in the bottom 11.4% nationally. Distance to a nursing home settles at the national minimum, shared with about 27% of ZIPs. Poverty rests in the bottom 13.7% nationally, modeled transportation lands in the bottom 13.7% nationally, and modeled food insecurity settles in the bottom 14.1% nationally. Modeled energy burden rests in the bottom 12.7% nationally. On the other side, modeled industrial-pollution burden lands in the top 9.5% nationally, and distance to a Superfund site settles in the bottom 10.5% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 45039, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 74%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 89%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 74%

13%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 55%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 43%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 59%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 36%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 92%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 62%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 77%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 83%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 92%

7%

About typical

Healthcare Access

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 79%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 78%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 61%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 62%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 69%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 71%

8%

Disability

healthier than 82%

7%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 37%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 34%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 78.4 ± 1.1 years. A median household income of $123,366 predicts 80.9 years — 2.5 years below.

    Ranked #3,484 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.4%24.5–30.4
High blood pressure among adults32.0%28.6–35.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.8%8.0–9.6
Current asthma among adults10.5%9.3–11.7
Coronary heart disease among adults5.8%5.3–6.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults6.4%5.7–7.3
Depression among adults24.6%21.3–28.0
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.8%9.4–12.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened34.9%31.2–38.7
Obesity among adults34.4%28.6–40.5
Stroke among adults2.8%2.6–3.1
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years12.6%10.3–15.1
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.1%5.1–7.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure78.5%75.5–81.3
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.0%75.5–82.0
Cholesterol screening among adults87.6%85.9–89.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years67.7%63.2–72.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults68.8%65.6–71.9
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years76.4%69.4–82.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults18.6%15.5–21.9
Current cigarette smoking among adults13.9%11.9–16.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults20.6%17.5–24.4
Short sleep duration among adults35.6%30.2–41.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.1%13.2–17.4
Frequent mental distress among adults16.5%14.6–18.5
Frequent physical distress among adults12.1%10.7–13.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults12.1%10.7–13.7
Any disability among adults24.2%21.0–27.8
Hearing disability among adults5.8%5.2–6.6
Independent living disability among adults6.3%5.6–7.1
Mobility disability among adults10.5%9.1–12.1
Self-care disability among adults2.8%2.5–3.1
Vision disability among adults3.4%3.1–3.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.1%16.0–22.5
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults9.2%7.5–11.0
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults6.9%5.6–8.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.4%7.0–9.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.5%4.7–6.3
Loneliness among adults30.0%25.1–35.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.9%5.0–6.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate3.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–646.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)3.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)36.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle1.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription94.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)18.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate90.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)1.3%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population3.3%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households49.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+13.5%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age36.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$123,366$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$351,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,215$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth78.4 yr ± 0.5778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.57 years of 78.4, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured