Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45429

in Kettering, OhioPopulation 26,347

58.03/ 100

Ranked #6,368 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #110 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 9.4%)

Ranked #11 of 57 Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH ZIPs (top 19%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.9 per 1,000 residents

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Dental provider access

1.2 per 1,000 residents

in the top 4.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of dental offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

1.1 mi

in the bottom 7.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST6th
US8th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 9.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

2.7 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US9th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

Outpatient-care access

0.41 per 1,000 residents

in the top 11.0% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US89th
Definition & source ›

The number of outpatient clinics located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.3 per 1,000 residents

in the top 13.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST92nd
US86th
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

The read

By its overall health score, ZIP 45429, one of several in Kettering, Ohio lands in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,368th) and the top 9.4% of Ohio (110th).

continue reading

The measures split the difference for this area: physicians rests in the top 3.7% nationally, and dental providers is in the top 4.0% nationally. Lead in tap water stands at the national minimum. Distance to an emergency room settles at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Fatal road crashes lies in the bottom 9.2% nationally, and outpatient resides in the top 11.0% nationally. Against that, PFOS in drinking water lands at the national maximum, PFAS in drinking water registers at the national maximum, and distance to a Superfund site sits in the bottom 7.6% nationally. Modeled industrial-pollution burden rests in the top 9.1% nationally.

Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, lead in tap water runs far lower than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. To translate a couple of terms, PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 45419, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Dayton-Kettering-Beavercreek, OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 61%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 88%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 90%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 73%

11%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 77%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 86%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 81%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 92%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 93%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 93%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 88%

8%

Disability

healthier than 85%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 70%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 29%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 86%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 84%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 84%

8%

Disability

healthier than 79%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 89%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 75%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 52%

14%

Nothing measured is holding this score back.

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Above its nearby ZIPs

    The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors

    Estimated life expectancy is 79.1 ± 0.9 years. The 48 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 77.1 years — 2.0 years above them.

    Ranked #1,393 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults30.0%27.3–32.9
High blood pressure among adults35.2%32.0–38.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.7%9.8–11.7
Current asthma among adults10.6%9.5–11.8
Coronary heart disease among adults7.1%6.4–7.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Depression among adults25.2%22.2–28.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.4%10.9–14.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.1%31.9–38.6
Obesity among adults32.4%28.0–37.2
Stroke among adults3.4%3.1–3.6
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years11.5%9.5–13.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years5.8%4.9–6.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.2%77.8–82.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.7%79.0–84.2
Cholesterol screening among adults88.6%87.2–89.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years71.8%68.0–75.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults70.0%67.2–72.7
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years77.6%71.7–82.8
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.6–18.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults11.6%10.1–13.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults23.9%20.8–27.0
Short sleep duration among adults34.4%30.6–38.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults16.5%14.5–18.4
Frequent mental distress among adults15.4%13.9–17.1
Frequent physical distress among adults12.4%11.0–13.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults11.4%10.2–12.8
Any disability among adults27.4%24.3–30.5
Hearing disability among adults7.0%6.3–7.8
Independent living disability among adults6.7%6.0–7.4
Mobility disability among adults12.4%11.0–14.0
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.8–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.5–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults17.4%14.9–20.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.7–10.4
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.1–8.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults7.8%6.7–9.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults5.6%5.0–6.4
Loneliness among adults33.0%28.8–37.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults5.7%5.0–6.6
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–647.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)3.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)48.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)2.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle5.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription93.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.6%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate69.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.5%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population5.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households59.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+23.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age41.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$80,210$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$238,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,070$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.1 yr ± 0.4778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.47 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured