Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

24015

in Roanoke, VirginiaPopulation 15,865

57.96/ 100

Ranked #6,435 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 20%)

Ranked #189 of 873 Virginia ZIPs (top 22%)

Ranked #6 of 33 Roanoke, VA ZIPs (top 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFOS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOS, one of the most common “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Transit access

7 per 1,000 residents

in the top 2.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The number of public-transit stops inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Walkability

170 intersections/sq mi

in the top 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST98th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

0 ppb

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

US1st
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Fatal road crashes

1.9 per 100,000 residents per year

in the bottom 6.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST8th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The annual rate of fatal road crashes per 100,000 residents, pooled over a ten-year window.

A rate per resident population. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the rate to be reliable — about 30% of US ZIPs — no value is published rather than an unstable one; those ZIPs are absent from this comparison, not counted as crash-free.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, ZIP 24015, one of several in Roanoke, Virginia sits in the top 20% healthiest ZIPs nationally (6,435th) and the top 22% of Virginia (189th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: transit stands in the top 2.6% nationally, walkability is in the top 3.7% nationally, and lead in tap water rests at the national minimum. Fatal road crashes sits in the bottom 6.5% nationally, subsidized affordable housing registers in the top 12.5% nationally, and civic lands in the top 12.6% nationally. Outpatient resides in the top 12.9% nationally. On the other hand, PFOA in drinking water lies at the national maximum, and PFOS in drinking water settles at the national maximum. PFAS in drinking water stands at the national maximum.

Compared with the ZIPs that surround it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain language, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFOS in drinking water is a common one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. ZIP 24018, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Roanoke, VA metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 75%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 84%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 75%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 66%

11%

Disability

healthier than 81%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 73%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 30%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 82%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 80%

16%

Disability

healthier than 84%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 59%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 60%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 50%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 49%

5%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 11%

14%

Lifting this score

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 94%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 69%

16%

Mental Health

healthier than 67%

8%

Disability

healthier than 88%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 78%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 53%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 50%

11%

Holding it back

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 22%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults27.2%24.2–30.1
High blood pressure among adults33.0%29.4–36.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.3%7.6–9.1
Current asthma among adults10.7%9.5–12.0
Coronary heart disease among adults5.6%5.0–6.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Depression among adults24.4%21.1–27.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults10.6%9.3–12.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened35.5%31.8–39.3
Obesity among adults36.8%30.5–43.3
Stroke among adults2.9%2.7–3.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years8.4%6.8–10.2
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years6.7%5.5–7.9
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure75.3%72.3–78.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.3%73.9–80.5
Cholesterol screening among adults88.0%86.3–89.5
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years70.8%66.3–74.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults69.1%65.9–72.1
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years78.5%71.9–83.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults17.2%14.4–20.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults12.2%10.3–14.3
No leisure-time physical activity among adults21.2%17.7–24.8
Short sleep duration among adults36.0%30.4–41.5
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults15.4%13.3–17.6
Frequent mental distress among adults16.3%14.4–18.4
Frequent physical distress among adults12.2%10.7–13.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.6%11.9–15.3
Any disability among adults27.1%23.5–30.9
Hearing disability among adults6.0%5.3–6.8
Independent living disability among adults7.0%6.2–7.9
Mobility disability among adults11.7%10.1–13.3
Self-care disability among adults3.0%2.7–3.3
Vision disability among adults3.8%3.4–4.2
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults19.5%16.6–22.6
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.3–11.7
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.3%6.9–9.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.5–10.2
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.3–7.0
Loneliness among adults32.8%28.3–37.6
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.1–6.9
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate8.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,3649.2% (2.0–22.9%) n=863
Uninsured 18–6410.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2868.3% (0.0–19.2%) n=861
No HS diploma (25+)2.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5059.2% (1.9–20.7%) n=872
Bachelor's or higher (25+)47.7%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50526.0% (9.2–59.8%) n=872
Unemployment rate (16+)2.8%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.2% (0.0–8.2%) n=860
Households without a vehicle7.6%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3223.6% (0.0–11.3%) n=862
Broadband subscription91.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.9% (69.5–97.9%) n=862
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.2%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32223.1% (10.8–38.1%) n=862
Homeownership rate63.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.1% (52.2–95.9%) n=862
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.7% (0.0–4.0%) n=862
Foreign-born population3.9%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5532.9% (0.0–17.0%) n=874
Single-parent households40.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08754.3% (38.2–78.2%) n=855
Population 65+15.6%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55320.5% (10.8–37.3%) n=874
Median age36.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29243.6 yr (34.0–59.2) n=864
Median household income$69,831$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$73,854 ($46,504–$141,698) n=804
Median home value$267,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$274,800 ($123,240–$642,380) n=789
Median gross rent$898$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$1,144 ($742–$2,191) n=615
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)VA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth77.7 yr ± 0.7778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.6 yr (74.5–81.4) n=826

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.77 years of 77.7, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured