Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45033

in Hooven, OhioPopulation 377

31.10/ 100

Ranked #30,523 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.9%)

Ranked #1,128 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 4.1%)

Ranked #152 of 156 Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN ZIPs (bottom 2.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

30.1%

in the top 3.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

64.5%

in the bottom 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

81.6%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST12th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

56.1%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.0%

in the top 6.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 6.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST14th
US7th
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

20.5%

in the top 7.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 6.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

The read

On balance, and by the composite measure, Hooven, Ohio (ZIP 45033) ranks in the bottom 4.9% nationally (30,523rd) and the bottom 4.1% of Ohio (1,128th).

continue reading

Where this area bears down hardest, the measures speak first: modeled tooth loss stands in the top 3.1% nationally, and mammography settles in the bottom 2.5% nationally. Modeled pfas lies in the top 1.6% nationally, and colon screening resides in the bottom 6.1% nationally. Modeled independent living disability lands in the top 6.8% nationally, cognitive disability registers in the top 7.5% nationally, and industrial-pollution burden sits in the top 6.9% nationally. On the encouraging side, modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 2.8% nationally, floodplain exposure is at the national minimum, and modeled expected annual loss stands in the bottom 6.6% nationally.

Compared with the ZIPs it borders, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plainer terms, pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. For a healthier nearby ZIP overall, look to ZIP 45002, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 74%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 44%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 12%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 8%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 1.0%

8%

Disability

healthier than 12%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 37%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 72%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 61%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 11%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 21%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 1%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 26%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 90%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 10%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 13%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 3%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 3%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 2%

8%

Disability

healthier than 4%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 14%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.3%30.3–36.2
High blood pressure among adults38.9%35.7–42.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.1–8.9
Current asthma among adults13.3%11.8–15.0
Coronary heart disease among adults9.0%7.7–10.3
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.4%11.1–15.9
Depression among adults32.7%29.3–36.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults16.0%13.9–18.2
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened37.6%34.5–40.9
Obesity among adults39.6%35.2–44.2
Stroke among adults4.6%4.0–5.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years30.1%25.4–35.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.1%8.3–14.3
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.1%76.2–81.6
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults77.2%73.9–80.1
Cholesterol screening among adults81.1%78.3–83.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years56.1%51.9–60.3
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults46.1%42.9–49.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years64.5%56.9–71.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.5%14.0–19.0
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.8%21.6–30.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults34.6%29.9–39.9
Short sleep duration among adults41.2%37.2–45.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults28.5%24.2–33.5
Frequent mental distress among adults23.3%20.8–26.0
Frequent physical distress among adults18.6%16.0–21.4
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults20.5%17.6–24.0
Any disability among adults37.4%32.8–42.8
Hearing disability among adults8.3%7.2–9.5
Independent living disability among adults13.0%11.0–15.4
Mobility disability among adults19.3%16.2–22.7
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.1–7.4
Vision disability among adults7.4%6.3–8.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults23.1%19.4–27.0
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.2%18.4–28.3
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults23.1%18.0–28.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.1%12.9–19.3
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults11.6%9.6–13.8
Loneliness among adults36.2%31.4–41.1
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.2–14.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.1%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6411.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)15.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)15.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle12.3%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription90.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)40.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate71.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households58.6%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+17.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age37.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$42,500$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$83,200$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$815$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth67.9 yr ± 2.0278.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.02 years of 67.9, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured