Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

25977

in Meadow Creek, West VirginiaPopulation 50

27.00/ 100

Ranked #31,245 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 2.6%)

Ranked #575 of 697 West Virginia ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Tooth loss

43%

in the top 0.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

41.4%

in the bottom 0.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Cognitive disability

22.8%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

45.2%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

Poverty rate

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

86.6%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST62nd
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Homeownership rate

100%

at the national maximum

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of occupied homes that are owned, rather than rented, by the people living in them.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

13.8%

in the top 4.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST77th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

32.4%

in the top 4.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST78th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

The read

Meadow Creek, West Virginia (ZIP 25977), by its overall standing, sits in the bottom 2.6% nationally (31,245th) and the bottom 18% of West Virginia (575th).

continue reading

The data points to real strain across a number of measures here: modeled tooth loss stands in the top 0.3% nationally, colon screening lands in the bottom 0.3% nationally, and cognitive disability is in the top 2.7% nationally. Modeled short sleep resides in the top 2.8% nationally, independent living disability rests in the top 4.5% nationally, and fair or poor health lies in the top 4.9% nationally. On the brighter side, housing-cost burden sits at the national minimum, and poverty settles at the national minimum. Modeled tree cover registers in the top 2.5% nationally, and homeownership stands at the national maximum.

Held up against its neighbors, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. The nearest ZIP ranking healthier overall is ZIP 25918, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 82%

14%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 10%

13%

Risk Behavior

in the bottom 0.8%

11%

Mental Health

in the bottom 0.5%

8%

Disability

healthier than 8%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 39%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 51%

21%

Holding it back

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 27%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 2%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 9%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 27%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults38.9%34.1–43.7
High blood pressure among adults45.1%39.2–50.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.6%6.6–8.7
Current asthma among adults14.0%12.1–16.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.5%6.8–10.4
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.1%9.7–17.1
Depression among adults33.7%28.7–39.2
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.9%14.5–21.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.7%36.8–47.1
Obesity among adults43.2%34.1–52.8
Stroke among adults4.4%3.5–5.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years43.0%37.3–48.6
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.1%6.2–18.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure77.7%73.3–81.5
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.4%74.5–83.4
Cholesterol screening among adults84.9%80.3–88.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years41.4%36.7–46.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults39.4%35.6–43.2
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.0%63.9–79.7
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.0–17.6
Current cigarette smoking among adults28.1%18.5–36.4
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.7%29.2–47.6
Short sleep duration among adults45.2%38.1–52.6
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults32.4%24.2–41.4
Frequent mental distress among adults24.5%20.1–28.7
Frequent physical distress among adults20.7%16.3–25.5
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults22.8%17.1–29.0
Any disability among adults42.2%33.4–51.1
Hearing disability among adults8.4%6.9–10.1
Independent living disability among adults13.8%10.3–17.7
Mobility disability among adults21.4%16.4–27.2
Self-care disability among adults6.5%4.7–8.7
Vision disability among adults7.8%5.8–10.1
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults24.2%18.4–29.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults23.9%15.6–33.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults28.7%18.8–38.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults17.9%12.3–23.6
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults12.4%9.0–16.4
Loneliness among adults33.6%27.0–39.8
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults17.0%12.3–21.3
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate0.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36416.3% (0.0–41.0%) n=694
Uninsured 18–640.0%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.1% (0.0–21.5%) n=682
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50511.8% (0.9–29.6%) n=695
Bachelor's or higher (25+)0.0%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50514.1% (0.0–32.5%) n=695
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.4% (0.0–17.9%) n=668
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.3% (0.0–17.1%) n=694
Broadband subscription70.8%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32285.7% (62.6–100.0%) n=694
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)0.0%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32216.7% (0.0–34.6%) n=694
Homeownership rate100.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32284.0% (61.6–100.0%) n=694
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.0% (0.0–4.1%) n=694
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.0% (0.0–2.1%) n=696
Single-parent households100.0%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08757.0% (31.3–90.6%) n=686
Population 65+14.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55322.0% (10.4–45.0%) n=696
Median age46.5 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29245.9 yr (32.6–62.1) n=681
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$55,088 ($33,083–$85,218) n=539
Median home value$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$125,600 ($66,920–$223,500) n=553
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$802 ($586–$1,085) n=293
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)WV median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.8 yr ± 2.1078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.2 yr (73.1–81.1) n=686

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 2.10 years of 73.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured