Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

45688

in Waterloo, OhioPopulation 210

31.12/ 100

Ranked #30,518 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 4.9%)

Ranked #1,127 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 4.2%)

Ranked #48 of 65 Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH ZIPs (bottom 26%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Park land

66.2%

in the top 1.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area that is public parkland.

Full methodology ›

PFOA in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFOA, one of the man-made “forever chemicals,” was detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Tree cover

85.9%

in the top 2.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area covered by forest.

Full methodology ›

Tooth loss

27.1%

in the top 5.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 65 and older who have lost all of their natural teeth.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.8%

in the top 3.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Short sleep

43.6%

in the top 5.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who usually sleep less than seven hours in a 24-hour period.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

100%

at the national maximum

Lower is healthier

ST99th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The share of residents served by public water systems where PFAS — man-made “forever chemicals” that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down — were detected in EPA testing.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Colon-cancer screening

55.8%

in the bottom 5.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST2nd
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults aged 45–75 who are up to date on colorectal-cancer screening.

Full methodology ›

Housing-cost burden

45.5%

in the top 5.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US95th
Definition & source ›

The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.

Full methodology ›

The read

Waterloo, Ohio (ZIP 45688) ranks in the bottom 4.9% nationally (30,518th) and the bottom 4.2% of Ohio (1,127th).

continue reading

Several readings make the pressure on this area plain: PFOA in drinking water rests at the national maximum, and modeled tooth loss lands in the top 5.1% nationally. Modeled energy burden settles in the top 3.5% nationally, and short sleep rests in the top 5.3% nationally. PFAS in drinking water lands at the national maximum, modeled colon screening settles in the bottom 5.8% nationally, and housing-cost burden rests in the top 5.2% nationally. On the encouraging side, park land lands in the top 1.3% nationally, modeled transportation noise settles at the national minimum, and modeled tree cover rests in the top 2.7% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, PFOA in drinking water is one of the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. PFAS in drinking water is the family of man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 45656, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts. Compare it against the US, this state and the Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH metro area.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 71%

14%

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 56%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 5%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 8%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 15%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 2%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 6%

8%

Disability

healthier than 11%

7%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 18%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 7%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 7%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 4%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 9%

8%

Disability

healthier than 5%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 23%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

in the top 0.00%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 79%

8%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 65%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 23%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 30%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 9%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 16%

11%

Disability

healthier than 21%

7%

Healthcare Access

in the bottom 0.00%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults37.0%33.9–40.2
High blood pressure among adults47.0%43.4–50.6
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.3%8.4–10.2
Current asthma among adults11.8%10.5–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults10.5%9.1–11.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults13.8%11.6–16.0
Depression among adults28.1%24.7–31.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.2%15.9–20.5
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened41.6%38.0–45.2
Obesity among adults45.2%39.6–50.5
Stroke among adults5.1%4.5–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years27.1%23.2–30.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years10.4%8.2–13.0
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.8%78.2–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.7%76.7–82.2
Cholesterol screening among adults83.4%81.1–85.4
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years55.8%51.0–60.5
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults48.2%44.8–51.3
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years68.4%60.9–74.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults14.1%11.9–16.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults25.7%21.5–30.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults38.2%32.9–43.6
Short sleep duration among adults43.6%38.8–48.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults29.5%25.3–33.8
Frequent mental distress among adults21.0%18.5–23.4
Frequent physical distress among adults19.3%16.8–21.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults19.0%16.5–21.7
Any disability among adults41.7%36.9–46.7
Hearing disability among adults9.8%8.6–11.1
Independent living disability among adults12.0%10.4–13.8
Mobility disability among adults21.1%18.0–24.2
Self-care disability among adults6.2%5.2–7.2
Vision disability among adults7.5%6.5–8.6
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.9%19.3–26.7
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.9%17.7–26.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults21.9%17.8–26.2
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.1%12.6–17.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.1–12.6
Loneliness among adults37.4%32.2–42.5
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults12.1%10.2–14.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate31.4%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6428.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)0.0%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle0.0%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription74.0%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)45.5%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate83.1%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households20.8%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+8.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age32.8 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$52,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth72.5 yr ± 1.8778.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.87 years of 72.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured