Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43811

in Conesville, OhioPopulation 354

44.04/ 100

Ranked #23,376 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 27%)

Ranked #794 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 32%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Home broadband subscription

61.9%

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US3rd
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

22.4%

in the top 3.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST95th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Transportation noise

12.9%

in the top 5.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of residents exposed to average road, rail, and aviation noise at or above 55 decibels — a noticeable background presence.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 8.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST73rd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

Median household income

$35,897

in the bottom 3.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST4th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The middle household income in this ZIP — half of households earn more, half earn less — in dollars per year.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

2.8%

in the top 11.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US88th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Energy-cost burden

5.0%

in the top 9.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST94th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The modeled share of household income spent on home energy bills — electricity, gas, and heating fuels.

A modeled share of household income spent on home energy. Estimates that hit the model’s 100% ceiling are suppressed rather than published, because at that point the figure reflects the model’s limit rather than a measured burden.

Full methodology ›

Slow internet speeds

0.55%

in the top 19% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US81st
Definition & source ›

The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.

Full methodology ›

Air-toxics cancer risk

20 per million

in the bottom 25% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US25th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled estimate of added lifetime cancer risk from breathing outdoor air toxics, in cases per million people exposed over a lifetime.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

2.1%

in the bottom 27% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST7th
US27th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

The read

Conesville, Ohio (ZIP 43811), by its composite score, sits in the bottom 27% nationally (23,376th) and the bottom 32% of Ohio (794th).

continue reading

The measures land in both directions, and neither dominates: housing-cost burden registers in the bottom 11.4% nationally, and modeled expected annual loss settles in the bottom 12.0% nationally. Pulling the other way, home broadband subscription sits in the bottom 3.3% nationally, and households without a vehicle lies in the top 3.8% nationally. Modeled transportation noise rests in the top 5.7% nationally, and radon resides in the top 8.8% nationally. Fiber broadband is at the national minimum, shared with about 19% of ZIPs. Household income lands in the bottom 3.7% nationally, outer-floodplain exposure stands in the top 11.6% nationally, and modeled energy burden registers in the top 9.7% nationally.

Next to the surrounding area, outer-floodplain exposure runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For anyone unfamiliar, radon is a radioactive soil gas the EPA identifies as the top cause of lung cancer in nonsmokers. Expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to average road, rail, and air noise at or above 55 decibels. For a healthier comparison close by, see ZIP 43821, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 45%

13%

Disability

healthier than 53%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 50%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 42%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 31%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 12%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 24%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 21%

8%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Risk Behavior

healthier than 48%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 46%

8%

Disability

healthier than 47%

7%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 40%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 31%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 35%

13%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 15%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 35%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.6%30.2–37.0
High blood pressure among adults38.7%34.6–42.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.8%8.9–10.8
Current asthma among adults11.0%9.8–12.4
Coronary heart disease among adults8.0%7.1–9.0
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.1%7.8–10.5
Depression among adults26.7%23.1–30.5
Diagnosed diabetes among adults13.3%11.5–15.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.8%34.7–43.0
Obesity among adults38.9%31.9–46.0
Stroke among adults3.9%3.4–4.4
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.8%16.9–22.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.9%6.2–9.7
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.3%77.9–82.7
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.5%76.2–82.4
Cholesterol screening among adults85.8%83.9–87.6
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.7%56.1–65.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults61.6%58.5–64.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years73.8%66.9–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.8%14.0–19.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.2%14.4–20.2
No leisure-time physical activity among adults28.7%24.1–33.6
Short sleep duration among adults37.8%32.5–43.2
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults19.7%16.9–22.9
Frequent mental distress among adults17.9%15.8–20.2
Frequent physical distress among adults15.0%13.1–17.1
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults14.8%12.9–17.0
Any disability among adults30.9%26.7–35.2
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.9
Independent living disability among adults8.6%7.5–9.9
Mobility disability among adults14.8%12.7–17.2
Self-care disability among adults3.9%3.4–4.5
Vision disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults21.5%18.1–25.3
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.2–15.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults10.5%8.5–12.8
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.3–12.0
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults7.1%6.0–8.2
Loneliness among adults35.6%30.4–41.3
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults7.2%6.1–8.4
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate7.9%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6417.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)11.8%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)17.2%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)6.3%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle22.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription61.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)11.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate79.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.8%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households72.9%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+55.4%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age72.0 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$35,897$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$103,600$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$919$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth76.0 yr ± 1.5478.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.54 years of 76.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured