Skip to main content
ZipVitals

Insights & Rankings Compare

Compare ZIP codes side by side

Line up 2–5 ZIP codes and read the ZipVitals Score, both ranks, and every scoring domain against the same national scale. Descriptive of documented conditions — never a verdict on the people who live there.

Comparing43811Conesville, OH18252Tamaqua, PA
2–5 ZIPs · 2 selected
ZipVitals Score and its national and state ranks, compared across 2 ZIP codes. Higher is healthier. The nine scoring domains follow, one table each.
Metric
ZipVitals Score44.04 Leads38.35
National rank#23,376of 32,066 US ZIPs Leads#27,811of 32,066 US ZIPs
State rank#794of 1,176 OH ZIPs#1,620of 1,748 PA ZIPs
Metro rankNot in a metro areaNot in a metro area

ZipVitals ScoreComposite of 9 scoring domainsNational rank, State rank and Metro rankAmong ZIPs with a computed score

Metro areas 43811: not in a metro area · 18252: not in a metro area.

Where these ZIPs differ, domain by domain

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score. Each one is placed on the same national scale, and the domains where these ZIPs are furthest apart come first. Higher is healthier in every one.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Every ranking, bar and gap below is measured against the same national group. Where a ZIP’s line also mentions its state or its metro area, that figure is measured against a different group — its own — so it is context for that one ZIP and never a comparison between them.

Furthest apart first

all 2 ZIPs can be placed on these 5 domains
Healthcare Access5% of the score 18252 leads · 42-point gap
18252Tamaquahealthier than 84% · no comparison group in Pennsylvania1 of 2
43811Conesvillehealthier than 42% · 35% in Ohio2 of 2
Climate / Disaster Risk5% of the score 18252 leads · 31-point gap
18252Tamaquahealthier than 81% · no comparison group in Pennsylvania1 of 2
43811Conesvillehealthier than 50% · 15% in Ohio2 of 2
Environmental Hazard14% of the score 43811 leads · 11-point gap
43811Conesvillehealthier than 16% · 31% in Ohio1 of 2
18252Tamaquahealthier than 5% · no comparison group in Pennsylvania2 of 2
Social Need / SDOH16% of the score 43811 leads · 7-point gap
43811Conesvillehealthier than 12% · 11% in Ohio1 of 2
18252Tamaquahealthier than 5% · no comparison group in Pennsylvania2 of 2
Preventive Care13% of the score 43811 leads · 7-point gap
43811Conesvillehealthier than 45% · 35% in Ohio1 of 2
18252TamaquaPartialhealthier than 38% · no comparison group in Pennsylvania2 of 2

Not every ZIP can be placed here

no leader and no gap — ordered by weight instead
Chronic Disease Burden21% of the scoreno leader — 18252 cannot be placed here
43811Conesvillehealthier than 31% · 40% in Ohio1 of 1
18252Tamaquanot placed — too little of this domain is measured here to compare reliably, though it still counts toward this ZIP’s score
Risk Behavior11% of the scoreno leader — 18252 cannot be placed here
43811Conesvillehealthier than 24% · 48% in Ohio1 of 1
18252Tamaquanot placed — too little of this domain is measured here to compare reliably, though it still counts toward this ZIP’s score
Mental Health8% of the scoreno leader — 18252 cannot be placed here
43811Conesvillehealthier than 21% · 46% in Ohio1 of 1
18252Tamaquanot measured in this ZIP at all — left out of its score rather than estimated
Disability7% of the scoreno leader — 18252 cannot be placed here
43811Conesvillehealthier than 53% · 47% in Ohio1 of 1
18252Tamaquanot measured in this ZIP at all — left out of its score rather than estimated

“Of the score” is the domain’s weight in the ZipVitals Score — a property of the score itself, the same on every ZIP. Where a ZIP has no measurement for a domain, that domain drops out of its score and the remaining weights scale up, so its own mix differs slightly from the weights shown here; each ZIP’s own page carries its exact shares. Not every ZIP sits in a metro area — those show a state figure only. A gap is the distance between the highest and lowest of these ZIPs on that domain’s national scale. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.

Data release 2026 · higher is healthier on every row. How the ZipVitals Score is calculated →

The State rank and Metro rank rows show no “Leads” marker: each ZIP is ranked against the ZIPs in its own state and the ZIPs in its own metro area, so those ranks are not ordered against one another.

Share this comparison

This comparison has its own permalink and an auto-generated preview card — the image that unfurls when you paste the link into a message, post, or story.

ZipVitalsZipVitals Score · compare

Conesville vs. Tamaqua

Conesville 43811 · OHLEADS44.04
Tamaqua 18252 · PA38.35

Data release 2026 · public federal and academic sources · higher is healthier

Preview of the auto-generated share card · ZipVitals Score, 0–100