Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43723

in Byesville, OhioPopulation 4,472

39.92/ 100

Ranked #26,817 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 16%)

Ranked #974 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (bottom 17%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Arsenic in groundwater

0.72%

in the bottom 0.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a Superfund site

0.2 mi

in the bottom 4.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST3rd
US4th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Superfund site — an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has listed for cleanup.

Full methodology ›

Industrial-pollution burden

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US96th
Definition & source ›

The EPA’s modeled screening score for industrial chemical releases, weighting the amounts released by their toxicity and how many people live nearby — a relative comparison score, not a measured exposure.

Full methodology ›

Child-care access

0.64 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The number of child day-care services inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Elder-services access

0.21 per 1,000 residents

in the top 6.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST96th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The number of services for older adults and people with disabilities inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Radon

3.1 pCi/L

in the top 9.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST72nd
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled typical indoor radon level for this area, in picocuries per liter — the EPA recommends fixing a home at 4 pCi/L or above.

Modeled from indoor-radon measurements. In Alaska and Hawaii, where those measurements are not published, a US Geological Survey geologic radon-potential category stands in — a coarser input, disclosed rather than hidden.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

57.3%

in the top 9.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Households without a vehicle

12.7%

in the top 9.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST87th
US90th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with no vehicle available.

Full methodology ›

Outer-floodplain exposure

2.4%

in the top 13.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US87th
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 0.2%-annual-chance flood band — the “500-year” zone, a lower but real 1-in-500 yearly chance.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

The read

Overall, Byesville, Ohio (ZIP 43723) lands in the bottom 16% nationally (26,817th) and the bottom 17% of Ohio (974th).

continue reading

A number of measures pull each way for this area: modeled arsenic settles in the bottom 0.2% nationally, and childcare resides in the top 6.3% nationally. Elder services registers in the top 6.6% nationally, and modeled disaster risk rests in the bottom 10.9% nationally. Set against that, distance to a Superfund site stands in the bottom 4.4% nationally, modeled industrial-pollution burden lies in the top 4.4% nationally, and modeled radon lands in the top 9.4% nationally. Modeled pfas sits in the top 9.2% nationally, households without a vehicle is in the top 9.9% nationally, and unemployment settles in the top 12.4% nationally.

Set beside the nearby areas, industrial-pollution burden runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. A note on the terms: arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Distance to a Superfund site is an abandoned or uncontrolled hazardous-waste site the EPA has identified for cleanup. Industrial-pollution burden is the EPA's modeled screening score weighting industrial chemical releases by their toxicity and how many people live nearby. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 43750, just across the boundary, ranks better overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 40%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 58%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 22%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 38%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 8%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 39%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 10%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 8%

8%

Disability

healthier than 31%

7%

Nothing measured is lifting this score.

About typical

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 55%

5%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 26%

21%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 14%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 26%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 21%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 12%

8%

Disability

healthier than 19%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 9%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults33.7%30.3–37.2
High blood pressure among adults39.6%35.5–43.7
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults9.4%8.5–10.2
Current asthma among adults11.7%10.4–13.2
Coronary heart disease among adults8.7%7.8–9.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults10.9%9.5–12.3
Depression among adults28.3%24.6–32.3
Diagnosed diabetes among adults14.8%12.9–16.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.4%35.3–43.6
Obesity among adults38.9%32.2–46.2
Stroke among adults4.3%3.8–4.7
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years18.6%15.4–21.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years9.2%7.6–11.1
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure79.7%77.0–82.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults79.0%75.6–82.1
Cholesterol screening among adults83.8%81.7–85.8
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.4%59.7–68.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults56.0%52.5–59.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.2%67.9–81.5
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults15.5%12.8–18.4
Current cigarette smoking among adults19.9%17.1–23.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults33.3%28.3–38.7
Short sleep duration among adults40.3%34.6–46.0
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults24.1%21.0–27.3
Frequent mental distress among adults20.1%17.8–22.5
Frequent physical distress among adults16.5%14.5–18.6
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.0%15.0–19.2
Any disability among adults34.8%30.3–39.4
Hearing disability among adults8.2%7.3–9.2
Independent living disability among adults10.3%9.1–11.6
Mobility disability among adults17.1%14.8–19.4
Self-care disability among adults4.8%4.2–5.3
Vision disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.5
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults22.0%18.7–25.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults16.8%14.0–19.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults15.1%12.6–18.0
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults12.5%10.6–14.7
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults8.9%7.7–10.3
Loneliness among adults36.5%31.2–42.2
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults9.3%8.0–10.8
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate15.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–648.7%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)15.1%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)11.1%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)8.9%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle12.7%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription86.4%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)26.7%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate64.2%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.8%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population0.5%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households47.5%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+16.3%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age41.6 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$51,474$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$110,800$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$867$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth74.5 yr ± 1.2178.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.21 years of 74.5, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured