Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

43768

in Old Washington, OhioPopulation 211

51.10/ 100

Ranked #14,681 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 46%)

Ranked #358 of 1,176 Ohio ZIPs (top 30%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Unemployment rate

22.2%

in the top 1.7% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST98th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The share of the civilian labor force that is unemployed.

Full methodology ›

Expected annual disaster loss

$0

in the bottom 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST6th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.

Full methodology ›

Floodplain exposure

0.00%

at the national minimum

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The share of this ZIP’s land area inside FEMA’s 1%-annual-chance floodplain — the “100-year” flood zone, where flooding has about a 1-in-100 chance in any given year.

Measured from FEMA’s mapped flood panels. Where a panel has not been mapped, no value is published for that ZIP — those ZIPs are absent from this comparison rather than counted as unexposed.

Full methodology ›

Natural-disaster risk

in the bottom 3.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US3rd
Definition & source ›

This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.

Full methodology ›

Fiber broadband

99.5%

in the top 3.3% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.

Full methodology ›

Mammography

79.6%

in the top 13.6% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST94th
US86th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of women aged 50–74 who had a mammogram within the past two years.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

6.5 mi

in the top 22% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST92nd
US78th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

The read

In overall standing, Old Washington, Ohio (ZIP 43768) comes out in the top 46% healthiest ZIPs nationally (14,681st) and the top 30% of Ohio (358th).

continue reading

Both sides of the picture show up plainly in this area's numbers: modeled expected annual loss settles in the bottom 2.6% nationally, floodplain exposure registers at the national minimum, and modeled disaster risk stands in the bottom 3.3% nationally. Fiber broadband lands in the top 3.3% nationally, walkability is in the top 11.0% nationally, and modeled mammography resides in the top 13.6% nationally. Outer-floodplain exposure rests at the national minimum, shared with about 36% of ZIPs. By contrast, unemployment lies in the top 1.7% nationally, and homeownership sits in the bottom 16% nationally. Modeled transportation noise settles in the top 19% nationally.

Relative to the ZIPs around it, walkability runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. In plain terms, expected annual loss is FEMA's modeled estimate, in dollars, of average yearly harm to people from natural hazards. Disaster risk is the area's national rank on its highest non-flood peril in FEMA's modeled Risk Index, like wildfire or quake. Floodplain exposure is land with about a 1-in-100 chance of flooding each year, nicknamed the "100-year floodplain". The nearest healthier ZIP overall is ZIP 43762, about 12 miles away.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Preventive Care

healthier than 76%

13%

Disability

healthier than 66%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 83%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 42%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 42%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 45%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 44%

11%

Holding it back

Mental Health

healthier than 31%

8%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 28%

5%

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 73%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 79%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 75%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 66%

8%

Disability

healthier than 65%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 84%

5%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 56%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 47%

16%

Holding it back

Healthcare Access

healthier than 15%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults32.8%29.4–36.2
High blood pressure among adults37.1%33.1–41.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults10.8%9.8–12.0
Current asthma among adults10.8%9.5–12.1
Coronary heart disease among adults7.7%6.7–8.7
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults8.2%6.8–9.8
Depression among adults25.7%22.0–29.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults12.2%10.4–14.1
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened39.0%34.7–43.1
Obesity among adults34.1%27.6–40.9
Stroke among adults3.6%3.2–4.2
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years17.8%15.0–21.0
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years7.1%5.2–9.2
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%78.1–83.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults80.2%76.9–83.3
Cholesterol screening among adults86.7%84.4–88.9
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years68.7%64.4–72.8
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults60.3%56.9–63.4
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years79.6%73.2–85.1
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults16.0%13.2–19.2
Current cigarette smoking among adults14.2%11.4–17.0
No leisure-time physical activity among adults27.5%22.5–32.4
Short sleep duration among adults37.6%32.1–43.1
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults18.4%15.2–21.8
Frequent mental distress among adults17.2%14.9–19.4
Frequent physical distress among adults13.8%11.8–15.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults13.5%11.4–15.7
Any disability among adults30.2%25.5–34.7
Hearing disability among adults7.8%6.7–8.8
Independent living disability among adults7.8%6.5–9.2
Mobility disability among adults14.0%11.7–16.7
Self-care disability among adults3.3%2.8–4.0
Vision disability among adults4.2%3.5–4.9
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults20.8%17.3–24.8
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults10.4%8.0–13.2
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults8.0%6.0–10.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults8.8%7.0–10.8
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults6.1%5.0–7.3
Loneliness among adults35.3%29.8–41.0
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults6.0%5.0–7.2
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate12.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36410.7% (3.5–26.2%) n=1,177
Uninsured 18–6410.9%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,2867.8% (2.5–18.1%) n=1,174
No HS diploma (25+)5.4%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,5057.5% (2.3–17.0%) n=1,179
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.8%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50519.7% (8.1–45.8%) n=1,179
Unemployment rate (16+)22.2%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2743.7% (0.0–9.8%) n=1,171
Households without a vehicle3.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.0–14.5%) n=1,177
Broadband subscription89.7%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32288.9% (76.5–96.0%) n=1,177
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)25.3%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32221.3% (11.2–34.6%) n=1,177
Homeownership rate59.8%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32278.3% (52.8–91.8%) n=1,177
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.4%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3220.8% (0.0–3.5%) n=1,177
Foreign-born population10.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5531.0% (0.0–6.8%) n=1,180
Single-parent households72.2%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08753.2% (36.6–68.1%) n=1,168
Population 65+23.7%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55319.0% (11.1–27.2%) n=1,180
Median age41.2 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29241.5 yr (33.2–50.5) n=1,169
Median household income$64,063$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$70,500 ($46,328–$101,197) n=1,127
Median home value$137,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$177,700 ($104,860–$310,980) n=1,117
Median gross rent$1,258$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$907 ($714–$1,294) n=1,007
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)OH median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth79.0 yr ± 1.3878.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30877.9 yr (74.0–81.3) n=1,154

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.38 years of 79.0, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured