Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

31021

in Dublin, GeorgiaPopulation 28,190

40.77/ 100

Ranked #26,213 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 18%)

Ranked #547 of 711 Georgia ZIPs (bottom 23%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Loneliness

41.3%

in the top 2.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST91st
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.

Full methodology ›

Lead in tap water

9.2 ppb

in the top 3.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

US96th
Definition & source ›

The lead level at the 90th percentile of tap-water samples reported by the public water systems serving this ZIP, in parts per billion — the EPA requires action above 15 ppb.

Measured from EPA records for the public water systems that serve this ZIP. Households on private wells — roughly 30% of the US population — are not covered by this measure, and this figure says nothing about their water.

Full methodology ›

Physician access

2.4 per 1,000 residents

in the top 5.4% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US95th
Definition & source ›

The number of physicians’ offices located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Self-care disability

6.7%

in the top 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

45%

in the top 4.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.3%

in the bottom 7.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST37th
US7th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

47.3%

in the top 7.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Pharmacy access

0.41 per 1,000 residents

in the top 7.7% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST93rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The number of pharmacies located inside this ZIP’s boundary, per 1,000 residents.

Counted from establishments located inside this ZIP’s boundary, so one just across the line is not counted. Where a ZIP has too few residents for the density to be reliable, no value is published rather than an unreliable one.

Full methodology ›

Utility shut-off threat

14.3%

in the top 8.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST83rd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults whose household was threatened with a utility shut-off in the past 12 months.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

17.9%

in the top 8.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST82nd
US92nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

The read

Dublin, Georgia (ZIP 31021) ranks in the bottom 18% nationally (26,213th) and the bottom 23% of Georgia (547th).

continue reading

Several signals sit on each side of the ledger here: physicians is in the top 5.4% nationally. Distance to an emergency room registers at the national minimum, shared with about 11% of ZIPs. Modeled arsenic lies in the bottom 7.4% nationally, and pharmacy is in the top 7.7% nationally. Working the other way, modeled loneliness registers in the top 2.5% nationally, lead in tap water lies in the top 3.9% nationally, and modeled self-care disability is in the top 7.4% nationally. Modeled obesity registers in the top 4.4% nationally, high blood pressure lies in the top 7.1% nationally, and utility shutoff is in the top 8.2% nationally.

Against its neighbors, park land runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. For context, lead in tap water is the EPA trigger, 15 parts per billion in tap samples, above which a water system must act on lead. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. The closest ZIP that ranks healthier overall is ZIP 30428, just across the boundary.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 70%

14%

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Mental Health

healthier than 55%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 14%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 11%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 36%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 15%

11%

Disability

healthier than 13%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 20%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

in the top 0.00%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 57%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 54%

13%

Mental Health

healthier than 49%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 17%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 17%

11%

Disability

healthier than 20%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 18%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

2 of our published findings list this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Below what income predicts

    The ZIP codes that outlive their incomes

    Estimated life expectancy is 73.9 ± 1.4 years. A median household income of $55,697 predicts 77.8 years — 3.9 years below.

    Ranked #5,013 of the 5,842 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above what income predicts, highest first.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 70.4; chronic-disease standing 14.2 — 56 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #2,018 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults31.5%28.4–34.7
High blood pressure among adults47.3%43.4–51.2
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.0%7.2–8.7
Current asthma among adults11.3%10.0–12.6
Coronary heart disease among adults8.6%7.8–9.5
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.9%9.0–10.9
Depression among adults19.7%16.8–22.8
Diagnosed diabetes among adults17.9%15.9–20.0
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened38.7%34.8–42.7
Obesity among adults45.0%38.7–51.4
Stroke among adults5.4%5.0–5.8
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.3%19.0–25.9
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.6%12.8–16.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure80.6%78.1–82.8
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults81.0%77.8–83.7
Cholesterol screening among adults86.3%84.5–87.7
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years64.5%59.7–69.0
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults51.4%48.0–54.8
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years75.0%68.1–81.2
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults13.3%10.9–15.8
Current cigarette smoking among adults18.7%16.4–21.1
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.6%31.3–40.1
Short sleep duration among adults40.9%35.6–46.3
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults27.8%25.0–30.8
Frequent mental distress among adults18.7%16.6–20.8
Frequent physical distress among adults16.8%15.0–18.7
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults17.4%15.6–19.3
Any disability among adults36.0%32.1–40.2
Hearing disability among adults7.9%7.0–8.7
Independent living disability among adults12.3%11.1–13.5
Mobility disability among adults20.2%18.0–22.5
Self-care disability among adults6.7%6.2–7.3
Vision disability among adults8.5%7.9–9.3
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults26.6%23.3–30.4
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults26.0%23.3–28.9
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults24.9%22.5–27.4
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults19.8%17.6–22.1
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults13.5%12.1–15.1
Loneliness among adults41.3%36.5–46.4
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults14.3%12.7–16.1
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate26.8%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36413.8% (5.6–27.5%) n=709
Uninsured 18–6414.2%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28618.3% (8.4–29.7%) n=713
No HS diploma (25+)12.3%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50512.1% (3.9–22.9%) n=720
Bachelor's or higher (25+)21.9%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50521.3% (9.1–49.2%) n=720
Unemployment rate (16+)6.5%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.1% (0.6–9.6%) n=714
Households without a vehicle7.5%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3224.4% (0.3–12.3%) n=707
Broadband subscription89.2%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32287.3% (72.5–96.4%) n=707
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)32.4%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32225.1% (13.6–38.3%) n=707
Homeownership rate55.3%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32273.7% (48.8–89.0%) n=707
Crowded housing (>1 per room)3.2%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.7% (0.0–5.0%) n=707
Foreign-born population4.1%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5533.8% (0.0–15.8%) n=720
Single-parent households47.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08748.8% (36.1–66.7%) n=705
Population 65+18.1%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.0% (10.0–28.3%) n=720
Median age37.7 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.8 yr (33.1–51.4) n=715
Median household income$55,697$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$65,254 ($44,032–$106,158) n=677
Median home value$182,700$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$215,200 ($91,000–$413,150) n=666
Median gross rent$856$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$993 ($694–$1,769) n=627
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)GA median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth73.8 yr ± 0.7078.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30876.1 yr (73.3–79.7) n=668

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.70 years of 73.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured