Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38645

in Lyon, MississippiPopulation 786

29.76/ 100

Ranked #30,818 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 3.9%)

Ranked #351 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (bottom 13.6%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

Self-care disability

9.1%

in the top 1.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with difficulty dressing or bathing.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

3.8%

in the bottom 0.4% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST1st
US1st
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

22.4%

in the top 1.5% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Vision disability

11.4%

in the top 2.8% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST84th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who are blind or have serious difficulty seeing even with glasses.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

6.8%

in the top 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US98th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Mobility disability

27.8%

in the top 1.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST88th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.

Full methodology ›

High blood pressure

54.4%

in the top 1.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST86th
US99th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Independent-living disability

15.0%

in the top 2.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have difficulty doing errands alone, such as visiting a doctor’s office, because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition.

Full methodology ›

Fair or poor health

34.5%

in the top 3.0% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST85th
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who rate their own general health as fair or poor.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

10.2%

in the bottom 1.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST13th
US2nd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Cross-source signals

Health need and barriers to care documented here

On our reading, this ZIP code carries the overlap at its acute level: acute means at least three of the six health-need readings and at least three of the six access barriers apply to the same place.

These are two separate readings of public data that both apply to this place — never a claim that one causes the other, never a severity score, and never a statement about any person who lives here.

Health need documented here

  • Food insecurity
  • Housing insecurity
  • Adults reporting fair or poor health
  • Chronic conditions

Barriers to reaching care

  • Thin local supply of doctors
  • Thin local supply of pharmacies
  • Limited home internet for telehealth

A reading appears below only where this ZIP code is among the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on it — one national bar, the same for every ZIP in the country.

See the full care-deserts analysis →

The read

Overall, Lyon, Mississippi (ZIP 38645) lands in the bottom 3.9% nationally (30,818th) and the bottom 13.6% of Mississippi (351st).

continue reading

A number of measures mark what daily life looks like here: modeled self-care disability lies in the top 1.4% nationally, and diabetes lands in the top 1.5% nationally. Modeled vision disability sits in the top 2.8% nationally, and stroke is in the top 1.6% nationally. Modeled mobility disability settles in the top 1.2% nationally, high blood pressure resides in the top 1.0% nationally, and independent living disability registers in the top 2.6% nationally. Modeled fair or poor health rests in the top 3.0% nationally. On the brighter side, modeled pfas stands in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and binge drinking lies in the bottom 1.6% nationally.

A note on the terms: pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 38614, just across the boundary, ranks better overall. The ZIP also shows documented health need overlapping with barriers to reaching care, sitting in the most-affected 10% of US ZIP codes on several need measures and several access barriers.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 77%

5%

About typical

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 51%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 57%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 3%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 2%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 20%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 6%

11%

Disability

healthier than 2%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 10%

5%

Lifting this score

Healthcare Access

healthier than 76%

5%

About typical

Preventive Care

healthier than 49%

13%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 15%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 10%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 16%

14%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 18%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 37%

8%

Disability

healthier than 14%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 21%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults36.6%32.7–40.5
High blood pressure among adults54.4%49.8–59.1
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults7.4%6.6–8.1
Current asthma among adults11.5%10.0–13.0
Coronary heart disease among adults10.0%8.9–11.2
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults12.8%11.1–14.5
Depression among adults19.0%15.9–22.4
Diagnosed diabetes among adults22.4%19.7–25.3
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened43.4%38.8–48.0
Obesity among adults45.4%37.5–53.7
Stroke among adults6.8%6.1–7.5
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years22.7%18.9–26.7
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years14.7%12.1–17.5
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure82.9%80.4–85.1
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults84.1%81.2–86.8
Cholesterol screening among adults86.2%84.2–88.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years60.0%54.3–65.1
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults7.3%6.1–8.6
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years72.8%64.3–79.9
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults10.2%8.3–12.5
Current cigarette smoking among adults22.8%19.4–26.5
No leisure-time physical activity among adults43.2%37.2–49.2
Short sleep duration among adults42.5%35.4–49.4
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults34.5%30.2–38.9
Frequent mental distress among adults18.9%16.5–21.4
Frequent physical distress among adults19.3%16.8–21.8
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults21.4%18.6–24.3
Any disability among adults46.3%40.9–51.6
Hearing disability among adults9.3%8.1–10.4
Independent living disability among adults15.0%13.1–17.0
Mobility disability among adults27.8%24.4–31.2
Self-care disability among adults9.1%8.0–10.2
Vision disability among adults11.4%10.1–12.8
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults32.4%27.9–37.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults35.4%30.8–40.1
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults26.8%22.9–30.9
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults24.9%21.5–28.5
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults18.3%15.9–20.7
Loneliness among adults37.1%31.8–42.7
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults18.3%16.0–21.0
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate11.2%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6410.3%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)19.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)25.3%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)0.0%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle8.4%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription76.5%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)15.1%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate70.0%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)2.1%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population1.4%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households49.3%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+34.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age55.9 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$46,806$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$87,500$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$641$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.8 yr ± 0.9378.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.93 years of 75.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured