ZIP code
39762
in Mississippi State, MississippiPopulation 5,076
51.99/ 100
Ranked #13,454 of 32,066 US ZIPs (top 42%)
Ranked #31 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 7.7%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
High cholesterol
13.2%
in the bottom 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with high cholesterol, among those who have ever been screened for it.
Full methodology ›High blood pressure
14.3%
in the bottom 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.
Full methodology ›Diabetes
1.7%
in the bottom 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.
Full methodology ›Cognitive disability
26.6%
in the top 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions.
Full methodology ›Coronary heart disease
1.0%
in the bottom 0.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have coronary heart disease or angina.
Full methodology ›Stroke
0.60%
in the bottom 0.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.
Full methodology ›Slow internet speeds
100%
at the national maximum
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes whose fastest available download speed is under 10 Mbps.
Full methodology ›Loneliness
46%
in the top 0.6% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST99thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who report feeling lonely.
Full methodology ›Mobility disability
4.3%
in the bottom 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults with serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs.
Full methodology ›Hearing disability
2.9%
in the bottom 0.8% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST1stUS1stDefinition & source ›
The estimated share of adults who are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing.
Full methodology ›The read
By its overall health score, Mississippi State, Mississippi (ZIP 39762) lands in the top 42% healthiest ZIPs nationally (13,454th) and the top 7.7% of Mississippi (31st).
Neither strongly one way nor the other, the measures sit mixed: modeled diabetes sits in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and coronary heart disease rests in the bottom 0.5% nationally. Modeled stroke is in the bottom 0.4% nationally, and mobility disability stands in the bottom 0.7% nationally. Modeled hearing disability settles in the bottom 0.8% nationally, and fatal road crashes lies at the national minimum. Against that, modeled cognitive disability resides in the top 0.6% nationally, slow internet speeds lands at the national maximum, and modeled loneliness registers in the top 0.6% nationally. Modeled transportation sits in the top 3.7% nationally.
Weighed against the ZIPs nearby, slow internet speeds runs far higher than the surrounding ZIPs on this measure. Overall, the nearest healthier neighbor is ZIP 39705, about 17 miles away.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.8%
21%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 63%
14%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 67%
11%
Disability
healthier than 61%
7%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 70%
5%
Holding it back
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 10%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 3%
13%
Mental Health
healthier than 2%
8%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 33%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
in the top 0.8%
21%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 97%
11%
Disability
healthier than 95%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 92%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 66%
5%
About typical
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 41%
16%
Holding it back
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 28%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 2%
13%
Mental Health
in the bottom 0.4%
8%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Findings that name this ZIP
One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.
Above its nearby ZIPs
The ZIP codes that outlive their neighbors
Estimated life expectancy is 79.1 ± 1.7 years. The 49 nearest ZIP codes with estimates average 76.1 years — 3.0 years above them.
Ranked #839 of the 3,687 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by years above the nearby-ZIP average, highest first.
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
39759
Mississippishares a border
Score 50.30
Closest healthier
39705
Mississippiabout 17 mi away
Score 56.02
Similar health profile
32603
Florida99% similar profile
Score 48.77
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 5.5% | 4.5–6.6 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 14.3% | 11.9–16.9 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 0.8% | 0.7–0.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 10.8% | 9.3–12.4 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 1.0% | 0.8–1.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 2.6% | 2.0–3.2 |
| Depression among adults | 27.1% | 22.9–31.3 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 1.7% | 1.4–2.1 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 13.2% | 11.0–15.6 |
| Obesity among adults | 26.0% | 21.1–31.6 |
| Stroke among adults | 0.6% | 0.5–0.7 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 19.4% | 15.8–23.4 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.3% | 7.9–13.0 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 24.4% | 20.0–29.3 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 71.7% | 67.3–76.1 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 64.3% | 59.2–69.4 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 64.0% | 58.4–69.5 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 7.2% | 6.1–8.6 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 71.4% | 63.5–78.7 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 20.1% | 16.8–23.9 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 8.1% | 5.9–10.5 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 22.2% | 17.5–27.4 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 34.4% | 29.3–40.0 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 15.7% | 12.7–19.3 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 26.2% | 22.3–30.0 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 8.9% | 7.3–10.6 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 26.6% | 21.9–31.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 35.3% | 29.9–41.0 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 2.9% | 2.5–3.5 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 12.4% | 10.1–14.8 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 4.3% | 3.4–5.4 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 1.8% | 1.4–2.1 |
| Vision disability among adults | 5.4% | 4.5–6.5 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.9% | 21.5–30.2 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 22.8% | 17.4–27.8 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 12.4% | 9.1–15.9 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 14.2% | 11.2–17.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 17.5% | 14.2–20.6 |
| Loneliness among adults | 46.0% | 40.1–51.6 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 9.3% | 7.4–11.2 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MS median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | — | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 19.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 9.1% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 16.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 0.0% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 14.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 11.5% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411 |
| Households without a vehicle | — | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 5.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405 |
| Broadband subscription | — | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 79.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | — | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 22.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405 |
| Homeownership rate | — | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | — | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405 |
| Foreign-born population | 3.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412 |
| Single-parent households | — | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 46.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404 |
| Population 65+ | 0.0% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412 |
| Median age | 19.2 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 39.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $827 ($532–$1,130) n=319 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MS median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 79.1 yr ± 0.88 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 75.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 0.88 years of 79.1, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured