Skip to main content
ZipVitals

ZIP code

38929

in Gore Springs, MississippiPopulation 1,924

43.48/ 100

Ranked #23,925 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 25%)

Ranked #145 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 36%)

Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.

Robust across all 9 health domains

What defines this ZIP

Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.

High blood pressure

50.3%

in the top 3.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST63rd
US97th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have high blood pressure.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility

22.4 mi

in the top 3.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST99th
US96th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.

Full methodology ›

Arsenic in groundwater

1.1%

in the bottom 4.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST16th
US4th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that untreated groundwater in this area — the source private wells draw on — exceeds the federal arsenic limit of 10 micrograms per liter.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

PFAS in drinking water

8.6%

in the bottom 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST25th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.

A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.

Full methodology ›

Diabetes

18.3%

in the top 7.2% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST59th
US93rd
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been diagnosed with diabetes.

Full methodology ›

Binge drinking

11.9%

in the bottom 6.3% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST37th
US6th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who report binge drinking — five or more drinks on one occasion for men, four or more for women.

Full methodology ›

Obesity

44.1%

in the top 6.1% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST64th
US94th
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults with obesity, defined as a body-mass index of 30 or higher.

Full methodology ›

Stroke

5.4%

in the top 8.9% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST55th
US91st
Definition & source ›

The estimated share of adults who have been told by a health professional that they have had a stroke.

Full methodology ›

Distance to a nursing home

10.2 mi

in the top 10.6% nationally

Lower is healthier

ST96th
US89th
Definition & source ›

The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest Medicare- or Medicaid-certified nursing home.

Full methodology ›

Home broadband subscription

95.9%

in the top 14.8% nationally

Higher is healthier

ST95th
US85th
Definition & source ›

The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.

Full methodology ›

The read

By the composite measure, Gore Springs, Mississippi (ZIP 38929) sits in the bottom 25% nationally (23,925th) and the top 36% of Mississippi (145th).

continue reading

Where the data leans one way, another reading answers it: distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is in the top 3.8% nationally, modeled arsenic rests in the bottom 4.1% nationally, and modeled pfas sits in the bottom 6.1% nationally. Modeled binge drinking registers in the bottom 6.3% nationally. On the other hand, modeled high blood pressure lands in the top 3.2% nationally, and diabetes resides in the top 7.2% nationally. Modeled obesity lies in the top 6.1% nationally, and stroke settles in the top 8.9% nationally. Modeled mobility disability stands in the top 10.3% nationally, and distance to a nursing home is in the top 10.6% nationally.

In plain language, distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Arsenic is a natural groundwater contaminant, here a modeled estimate of the chance private-well levels exceed a benchmark. Pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. ZIP 38925, just across the boundary, ranks healthier overall.

What’s driving this score

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.

Compare within

Lifting this score

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 95%

14%

Mental Health

healthier than 85%

8%

Holding it back

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 13%

21%

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 23%

16%

Preventive Care

healthier than 33%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 29%

11%

Disability

healthier than 18%

7%

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 17%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 16%

5%

Lifting this score

Social Need / SDOH

healthier than 63%

16%

Environmental Hazard

healthier than 94%

14%

Preventive Care

healthier than 84%

13%

Risk Behavior

healthier than 64%

11%

Mental Health

healthier than 92%

8%

Disability

healthier than 62%

7%

About typical

Chronic Disease Burden

healthier than 41%

21%

Holding it back

Climate / Disaster Risk

healthier than 36%

5%

Healthcare Access

healthier than 5%

5%

“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Findings that name this ZIP

One of our published findings lists this ZIP code. Each finding compares one published measure against a stated benchmark, and names only the ZIP codes whose estimates are reliable enough to rank. See all surprising findings.

  • Clean environment, heavy chronic burden

    Where the environment and chronic illness point in opposite directions

    Environmental-hazard standing 94.7 (top 10%); chronic-disease standing 12.6 — 82 points apart, cleaner on the environment than it is on chronic illness.

    Ranked #400 of the 18,187 ZIP codes this finding names, ordered by the gap from cleanest environment to heaviest chronic burden, highest first.

Nearby & similar ZIPs

Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.

How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured

Evidence

Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.

Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Arthritis among adults34.5%31.1–38.3
High blood pressure among adults50.3%46.1–54.5
Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults8.9%8.1–9.7
Current asthma among adults10.1%8.9–11.3
Coronary heart disease among adults8.8%7.8–9.8
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults9.8%8.5–11.1
Depression among adults18.0%15.4–21.1
Diagnosed diabetes among adults18.3%16.1–20.9
High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened42.6%38.3–47.0
Obesity among adults44.1%36.8–51.6
Stroke among adults5.4%4.9–6.0
All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years19.2%16.3–22.5
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years11.2%9.1–13.6
Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure84.0%81.8–86.0
Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults82.6%79.8–85.3
Cholesterol screening among adults88.5%87.0–90.1
Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years63.3%58.5–67.7
Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults9.5%8.2–11.0
Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years74.1%66.9–80.3
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Binge drinking among adults11.9%9.9–14.3
Current cigarette smoking among adults17.2%14.7–19.9
No leisure-time physical activity among adults35.5%30.4–40.7
Short sleep duration among adults39.8%34.0–45.8
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults26.1%22.7–29.7
Frequent mental distress among adults15.9%14.1–17.8
Frequent physical distress among adults15.9%14.0–18.0
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Cognitive disability among adults16.7%14.7–18.9
Any disability among adults39.7%35.0–44.4
Hearing disability among adults8.9%7.9–10.0
Independent living disability among adults10.4%9.1–11.8
Mobility disability among adults21.8%18.9–24.7
Self-care disability among adults5.9%5.2–6.7
Vision disability among adults7.4%6.6–8.4
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
MeasureCrude prevalence95% CI
Lack of social and emotional support among adults29.1%25.2–33.1
Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults21.2%18.0–24.6
Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults12.2%10.0–14.7
Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults15.6%13.3–17.9
Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults10.8%9.4–12.3
Loneliness among adults35.9%31.0–40.9
Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults10.0%8.7–11.5
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Poverty rate25.0%10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,36419.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406
Uninsured 18–6439.4%9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,28616.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410
No HS diploma (25+)11.2%7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,50514.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411
Bachelor's or higher (25+)8.4%23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,50518.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411
Unemployment rate (16+)4.4%3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,2744.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411
Households without a vehicle9.1%3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,3225.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405
Broadband subscription95.9%89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,32279.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405
Housing cost burden (≥30% income)19.9%23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,32222.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405
Homeownership rate82.4%78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,32277.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405
Crowded housing (>1 per room)0.0%1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,3221.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405
Foreign-born population0.0%2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,5530.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412
Single-parent households70.7%53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,08746.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404
Population 65+24.0%19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,55317.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412
Median age44.1 yr42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,29239.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411
Median household income$68,202$72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318$50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377
Median home value$104,400$222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049$118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374
Median gross rent$814$1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670$827 ($532–$1,130) n=319
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
MeasureValueUS median (p10–p90)MS median (p10–p90)
Life expectancy at birth75.8 yr ± 1.4578.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,30875.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405

About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.45 years of 75.8, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.

More ZIPs to explore ▾

How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured