ZIP code
39737
in Bellefontaine, MississippiPopulation 298
45.03/ 100
Ranked #22,373 of 32,066 US ZIPs (bottom 30%)
Ranked #114 of 406 Mississippi ZIPs (top 28%)
Ranks are modeled estimates — ZIPs a few hundred places apart are effectively tied.
What defines this ZIP
Metrics where this ZIP sits in the tails of the national distribution — the ones that most set it apart. Select any tile for its definition and methodology.
PFAS in drinking water
4.5%
in the bottom 0.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST2ndUS1stDefinition & source ›
The modeled probability that PFAS “forever chemicals” would be detected in untreated groundwater in this area, the source private wells draw on.
A modeled likelihood for untreated groundwater, the source drawn on by private wells, which are federally unregulated. It is not a measurement of treated water delivered by a public system, and it is not a test of any individual well.
Full methodology ›Poverty rate
53%
in the top 1.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST98thUS99thDefinition & source ›
The share of residents whose income is below the federal poverty line, from the Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.
Full methodology ›Fiber broadband
99.4%
in the top 3.8% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST96thUS96thDefinition & source ›
The share of homes where fiber-optic internet service is available.
Full methodology ›Households without a vehicle
17.2%
in the top 5.7% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with no vehicle available.
Full methodology ›Home broadband subscription
69.7%
in the bottom 6.0% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST21stUS6thDefinition & source ›
The share of households with a broadband internet subscription.
Full methodology ›Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility
17.6 mi
in the top 6.1% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST97thUS94thDefinition & source ›
The distance in miles from this ZIP’s edge to the nearest facility that handles enough hazardous chemicals to require an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases.
Full methodology ›Housing-cost burden
42.6%
in the top 7.4% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST96thUS93rdDefinition & source ›
The share of households spending 30% or more of their income on housing.
Full methodology ›Walkability
2.3 intersections/sq mi
in the bottom 9.6% nationally
Higher is healthier
ST3rdUS10thDefinition & source ›
The number of street intersections per square mile — a standard street-connectivity measure; denser networks correlate with more walkable neighborhoods.
Full methodology ›Natural-disaster risk
in the bottom 11.5% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST7thUS11thDefinition & source ›
This area’s national rank on its single highest non-flood natural hazard — such as wildfire, tornado, or earthquake — in FEMA’s modeled National Risk Index; flooding is shown separately.
Full methodology ›Expected annual disaster loss
$0
in the bottom 15% nationally
Lower is healthier
ST8thUS15thDefinition & source ›
FEMA’s modeled estimate, in dollars per year, of the average harm to people expected from natural hazards — an annualized average, not a forecast for any single year.
Full methodology ›The read
Overall, Bellefontaine, Mississippi (ZIP 39737) lands in the bottom 30% nationally (22,373rd) and the top 28% of Mississippi (114th).
Where the load on this area runs deepest, the data leads: poverty is in the top 1.4% nationally, and households without a vehicle settles in the top 5.7% nationally. Home broadband subscription resides in the bottom 6.0% nationally, and housing-cost burden registers in the top 7.4% nationally. Walkability rests in the bottom 9.6% nationally. More encouragingly, modeled pfas stands in the bottom 0.7% nationally, fiber broadband lies in the top 3.8% nationally, and distance to a hazardous-chemical facility lands in the top 6.1% nationally. Unemployment sits at the national minimum, shared with about 15% of ZIPs. Modeled loud transportation noise is at the national minimum, shared with about 22% of ZIPs.
A note on the terms: pfas is the man-made "forever chemicals" that build up in the body and environment instead of breaking down; here a modeled estimate of the chance a private well contains them. Distance to a hazardous-chemical facility is a plant handling large amounts of hazardous chemicals that must file an EPA risk-management plan for accidental releases. Loud transportation noise is the modeled share of an area exposed to road, rail, and air noise at or above 65 decibels, near conversation volume. For a healthier nearby comparison, ZIP 39771, about 1.4 miles away, ranks better overall.
What’s driving this score
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score — here is how this ZIP does on each, and how much each one counts.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes.
Lifting this score
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 89%
14%
Mental Health
healthier than 69%
8%
Holding it back
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 25%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 22%
16%
Preventive Care
healthier than 23%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 39%
11%
Disability
healthier than 27%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 24%
5%
Healthcare Access
healthier than 15%
5%
Lifting this score
Chronic Disease Burden
healthier than 63%
21%
Social Need / SDOH
healthier than 60%
16%
Environmental Hazard
healthier than 72%
14%
Preventive Care
healthier than 62%
13%
Risk Behavior
healthier than 78%
11%
Mental Health
healthier than 66%
8%
Disability
healthier than 76%
7%
Climate / Disaster Risk
healthier than 68%
5%
Holding it back
Healthcare Access
healthier than 4%
5%
“Share” is how much of this ZIP’s score the domain accounts for. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Nearby & similar ZIPs
Editorially selected — see how this ZIP compares to nearby and similar places.
Nearby
38916
Mississippishares a border
Score 34.09
Closest healthier
39771
Mississippiabout 1.4 mi away
Score 47.23
Similar health profile
39082
Mississippi98% similar profile
Score 45.34
How these were chosen: only ZIPs with a published Score appear — a nearby ZIP with too little data to score won’t. Nearby means closest by distance between ZIP boundaries, which can cross state lines. A similar health profile is a close match across the nine Score domains, not similar demographics. Distances are measured between ZIP boundaries — ZIPs that touch share a border. How distance is measured
Evidence
Every measure this page draws on, by source. Collapsed by default — the full data stays in the page for search engines either way.
Health OutcomesCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Arthritis among adults | 32.4% | 28.6–36.5 |
| High blood pressure among adults | 45.7% | 41.1–50.5 |
| Cancer (non-skin) or melanoma among adults | 8.9% | 7.9–9.9 |
| Current asthma among adults | 9.8% | 8.5–11.3 |
| Coronary heart disease among adults | 7.9% | 6.7–9.1 |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among adults | 9.4% | 7.7–11.3 |
| Depression among adults | 20.4% | 17.1–24.1 |
| Diagnosed diabetes among adults | 15.2% | 13.0–17.8 |
| High cholesterol among adults who have ever been screened | 43.0% | 38.3–47.8 |
| Obesity among adults | 38.4% | 30.6–46.7 |
| Stroke among adults | 4.4% | 3.8–5.1 |
| All teeth lost among adults aged >=65 years | 21.0% | 17.2–25.0 |
PreventionCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Current lack of health insurance among adults aged 18-64 years | 10.4% | 7.6–13.8 |
| Taking medicine to control high blood pressure among adults with high blood pressure | 80.9% | 78.0–83.5 |
| Visits to doctor for routine checkup within the past year among adults | 81.5% | 77.8–84.8 |
| Cholesterol screening among adults | 87.3% | 84.7–89.5 |
| Colorectal cancer screening among adults aged 45–75 years | 62.6% | 57.2–67.6 |
| Visited dentist or dental clinic in the past year among adults | 9.7% | 8.2–11.3 |
| Mammography use among women aged 50-74 years | 72.1% | 63.3–79.8 |
Health Risk BehaviorsCDC PLACES 2022 / 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Binge drinking among adults | 13.2% | 10.6–16.0 |
| Current cigarette smoking among adults | 18.1% | 14.4–22.2 |
| No leisure-time physical activity among adults | 33.6% | 27.5–40.0 |
| Short sleep duration among adults | 35.4% | 28.6–42.7 |
Health StatusCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Fair or poor self-rated health status among adults | 23.6% | 19.7–28.1 |
| Frequent mental distress among adults | 16.6% | 14.4–19.2 |
| Frequent physical distress among adults | 15.5% | 13.2–18.1 |
DisabilityCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive disability among adults | 17.1% | 14.4–20.1 |
| Any disability among adults | 38.0% | 32.4–43.9 |
| Hearing disability among adults | 8.7% | 7.4–10.0 |
| Independent living disability among adults | 9.7% | 8.2–11.5 |
| Mobility disability among adults | 19.0% | 15.8–22.3 |
| Self-care disability among adults | 5.0% | 4.2–5.8 |
| Vision disability among adults | 6.3% | 5.4–7.3 |
Health-Related Social NeedsCDC PLACES 2023 · BRFSS
| Measure | Crude prevalence | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|
| Lack of social and emotional support among adults | 25.9% | 21.8–30.4 |
| Food insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 18.5% | 14.9–22.5 |
| Received food stamps in the past 12 months among adults | 10.6% | 8.2–13.2 |
| Housing insecurity in the past 12 months among adults | 13.5% | 11.1–16.2 |
| Lack of reliable transportation in the past 12 months among adults | 9.6% | 8.0–11.3 |
| Loneliness among adults | 34.6% | 29.2–39.9 |
| Utility services shut-off threat in the past 12 months among adults | 8.7% | 7.2–10.3 |
Community & economyCensus ACS 5-Year · 2024 release · observed
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MS median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Poverty rate | 53.0% | 10.6% (3.1–25.8%) n=32,364 | 19.9% (8.3–37.0%) n=406 |
| Uninsured 18–64 | 0.0% | 9.0% (1.5–24.3%) n=32,286 | 16.8% (8.1–29.3%) n=410 |
| No HS diploma (25+) | 21.8% | 7.9% (1.8–20.7%) n=32,505 | 14.4% (5.9–25.0%) n=411 |
| Bachelor's or higher (25+) | 0.0% | 23.3% (9.2–53.6%) n=32,505 | 18.0% (7.1–33.6%) n=411 |
| Unemployment rate (16+) | 0.0% | 3.9% (0.0–9.8%) n=32,274 | 4.8% (0.0–14.2%) n=411 |
| Households without a vehicle | 17.2% | 3.9% (0.0–12.5%) n=32,322 | 5.5% (0.0–13.9%) n=405 |
| Broadband subscription | 69.7% | 89.3% (75.1–97.1%) n=32,322 | 79.7% (62.7–93.0%) n=405 |
| Housing cost burden (≥30% income) | 42.6% | 23.7% (10.6–40.0%) n=32,322 | 22.7% (9.7–36.0%) n=405 |
| Homeownership rate | 57.4% | 78.7% (51.7–94.0%) n=32,322 | 77.2% (49.8–91.7%) n=405 |
| Crowded housing (>1 per room) | 0.0% | 1.3% (0.0–6.3%) n=32,322 | 1.4% (0.0–5.0%) n=405 |
| Foreign-born population | 0.0% | 2.6% (0.0–18.6%) n=32,553 | 0.6% (0.0–4.4%) n=412 |
| Single-parent households | 56.9% | 53.6% (37.3–74.1%) n=32,087 | 46.9% (29.2–61.4%) n=404 |
| Population 65+ | 18.8% | 19.4% (10.8–33.6%) n=32,553 | 17.8% (11.7–26.2%) n=412 |
| Median age | 34.9 yr | 42.2 yr (33.0–56.3) n=32,292 | 39.5 yr (30.5–49.6) n=411 |
| Median household income | — | $72,070 ($46,039–$118,707) n=30,318 | $50,353 ($32,100–$72,379) n=377 |
| Median home value | — | $222,200 ($100,300–$579,820) n=30,049 | $118,100 ($72,660–$219,420) n=374 |
| Median gross rent | — | $1,021 ($677–$1,912) n=25,670 | $827 ($532–$1,130) n=319 |
Life expectancyNCHS / RWJF USALEEP · model-based
| Measure | Value | US median (p10–p90) | MS median (p10–p90) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life expectancy at birth | 77.3 yr ± 1.55 | 78.9 yr (74.7–82.8) n=31,308 | 75.4 yr (72.7–79.0) n=405 |
About the ± — it’s this estimate’s give-or-take (statisticians call it the standard error). The true life expectancy for this ZIP most likely falls within 1.55 years of 77.3, and it’s very unlikely to be off by more than twice that.
More ZIPs to explore ▾More ZIPs to explore ▴
How these lists were built: they draw only from ZIPs that have a published Score, so ZIPs with too little data to score are not listed. Distance-based lists use distance between ZIP boundaries with no state filter, so an out-of-state ZIP can appear. Statistically similar means a close match across the nine Score domains, not a demographic match: the measure is the cosine similarity between two ZIPs’ domain scores, taken over the domains both ZIPs have data for and only where that overlap covers at least six of the nine — and where no ZIP clears that minimum-overlap floor, that list is left out rather than filled with a weak match. How distance is measured